The Roman Army at War: 100 BC-AD 200This detailed examination of the way in which the Roman army operated during a war and how it fought a battle breaks away from existing studies, which mostly concentrate on the army in peacetime, and attempts to understand the army as an institution whose ultimate purpose was to wage war. Adrian Goldsworthy explores the influence of the Roman army's organization on its behaviour during a campaign, emphasizing its great flexibility in comparison to most of its opponents. He considers the factors determining the result of a conflict and proposes, contrary to orthodox opinion, that the Roman army was able to adapt successfully to any type of warfare. Following the technique pioneered by John Keegan in The Face of Battle (1976), Dr Goldsworthy builds up a precise picture of what happened during battle: tactics employed, weaponry, leadership, behaviour of individuals as well as groups of soldiers, and, of utmost importance, morale. |
Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven
We hebben geen reviews gevonden op de gebruikelijke plaatsen.
Inhoudsopgave
The Organization of the Roman Army | 12 |
The Opposition | 39 |
The Gauls | 53 |
The Parthians | 60 |
Native Traditions and Auxiliary Recruitment | 68 |
The Campaign | 76 |
The Generals Battle | 116 |
The Units Battle | 171 |
The Individuals Battle | 248 |
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
able action actually advance allowed animals appearance archers armour army's attack attempted auxiliary baggage battle body Caesar camp campaign carried cavalry centurions century charge close cohorts column combat commander common considered Crassus decisive defeat described detail direct discipline discussed effective enemy equipment especially evidence face field fighting fire followed force formation formed fought front Gallic Gaul German head heavy helmet Hist horse important included individual infantry killed later legionaries legions less London military morale moving normally occasions officers operation opponents organization Parthian perhaps period placed Plutarch position possible practice probably protected ranks reserves result role Roman army Rome seems shield showed side similar single situation society soldiers strength success suggested supply Tacitus tactics train tribes troops turn units warfare weapons whilst