Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 1;Volume 14 |
Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven
We hebben geen reviews gevonden op de gebruikelijke plaatsen.
Overige edities - Alles weergeven
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
action admitted adverse possession agent appear applied assignment authority bill bond Britain British brought called capture cargo carried cause circuit court circumstances claim claimants common condemnation congress consequence considered constitution construction continued contract decided decision decree defendant delivered direct district Dunlop effect enemy entered entitled entry error evidence executed exercise exist extend fact farther France freight French give given grant ground held Hepburn & Dundas Hunter's importation instructions insured intended interest judge judgment judicial jurisdiction land letter Lord loss March Martin master nature necessary neutral object opinion original owner parties passed person plaintiff port possession present principle prize proceed proceedings proof purchase question reason receive record remain respect rule ship sufficient suit supposed taken term thing tion trade treaty United vessel vested voyage whole
Populaire passages
Pagina 352 - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty, or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity ; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
Pagina 326 - The powers not delegated to the United States are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people.' The government of the United States, therefore, can claim no powers which are not granted to it by the constitution, and the powers actually granted must be such as are expressly given, or given by necessary implication.
Pagina 368 - That a final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had...
Pagina 22 - ... exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas...
Pagina 94 - Is the Cherokee nation a foreign state in the sense in which that term is used in the Constitution ? The counsel for the plaintiffs have maintained the affirmative of this proposition with great earnestness and ability.
Pagina 357 - But no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal in any such case as aforesaid, than such as appears on the face of the record, and immediately respects the before mentioned questions of validity or construction of the said constitution, treaties, statutes, commissions, or authorities in dispute.
Pagina 353 - States, in the same manner and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect, as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a...
Pagina 306 - The court is unanimously of opinion, that the appellate power of the Supreme Court of the United States does not extend to this court, under a sound construction of the Constitution of the United States ; that so much of the 25th section of the Act of Congress to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States, as extends the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to this court, is not in pursuance of the Constitution of the United States; that the writ of error, in this...
Pagina 331 - It would seem, therefore, to follow, that congress are bound to create some inferior courts in which to vest all that jurisdiction which, under the constitution, is exclusively vested in the United States, and of which the supreme court cannot take original cognizance.
Pagina 17 - It is the opinion of a majority of the court that the mere grant to Congress of the power to regulate commerce did not deprive the States of power to regulate pilots, and that although Congress has legislated on this subject, its legislation manifests an intention, with a single exception, not to regulate this subject, but to leave its regulation to the...