Pagina-afbeeldingen
PDF
ePub

1849.]

Imperfection of Revelation.

501

present constitution of man and of the world, necessarily imperfect. Let us endeavour to discover why it is best they should be so, and thus to discern real perfection in apparent imperfection.

"1. It is best, because spiritual truth, if obtainable without exertion, would not be properly esteemed by man. He values least that which is most easily acquired; he values most that upon the obtaining of which he has expended the greatest amount of labor, whether of body or mind. Action is the condition upon which the health of the soul depends. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread,' said God unto Adam. By mental toil shalt thou earn thy soul's food,' is stamped quite as plainly on the mental and moral constitutions of his descendants. Herein is the analogy between the material and spiritual creations perfect....

"2. It is best that revelation should be imperfect, and hence that innumerable sects should be called into being, because, as in the animal existence of mankind, sickness and suffering in others call forth pity and benevolence in ourselves, so the soul's sickness, the ignorance and the spiritual wants (or what we deem the spiritual wants) of others, lead us to attempt to enlighten their path with our own feeble lamps, and to nourish them with our own scanty stores of knowledge, - lead us, in fine, to attempt their conversion. And if the attempt be made in the right spirit, our lamps glow the brighter, and our stores increase in proportion as we impart them to others. Differences in religious opinions are of incalculable benefit to mankind. They excite thought; and though the discussions which arise often fan the embers of discord, they serve also to keep alive the pure flame of true religion. Thus, differences in the physical condition of mankind, and differences in their spiritual condition, both alike serve to help them on their road to heaven.

"These latter differences result, inevitably, from the apparent imperfection of revelation, and the differences in the constitution of the minds and hearts of individuals. And,

"3. This brings us to our last and most important reason for the apparent imperfection of revelation. It does not appear alike to all, because the minds of men are not all alike. It is suited to the acknowledged imperfection of human nature. It is not entire, because the mind of man is not infinite, and therefore could not comprehend revelation if it were so. It was intentionally made imperfect. Prophets and holy men of old were designedly allowed to mingle with the eternal truths which they revealed some what of their own human passion and infirmity. Some minds cannot receive as truth that which seems perfectly plain to others. Perhaps none can receive truth unadulterated. As in the natural world an infinite variety of climate, of food, and of 43 - 4TH S. VOL. XI. NO. III.

VOL. XLVI.

occupation is provided for the infinite variety in the physical constitutions of men, so, in the Book in which God reveals himself to men, he has provided for the infinite variety in their spiritual constitutions. Thus, while the path of human duty is made plain to all, a wide range is given for theorizing and speculation. In the latter, every one may, and every one does, suit himself; and hence arise sects innumerable." pp. 52-56.

Many of the poetical pieces in this volume are beautiful, breathing lofty conceptions and pure thoughts in language and imagery worthy of their themes. We have room only for a part of one of these pieces, entitled, "Death on the Pale Horse (a Painting by Dunlap)."

"Not thus, not thus, should Death be shown,

With fearful form and countenance,

With writhing serpent following on,

With hope-annihilating glance,

With all that's withering to the heart,

And all that's hideous to the eye,

With hands from which pale lightnings dart,
With all that tends to terrify;

"Not thus should Death, our kindest friend,
To mortal view be bodied forth, -

Death, in whose bosom is an end

For all the sin and woe of earth:

O, 't is a heathen custom, this,

From which all Christians should be weaned;
The friend who ushers us to bliss

Should not be painted as a fiend.

"Around God's throne in heaven above,
Death was the mildest of the throng,
His heart most filled with holy love,
In warmth and charity most strong;
For angels differ in their frame

Like men, and not to all are given
A mind and heart in each the same;
Thus all are not alike in heaven.

"When God ordained man's destiny,

To Death the blessed task was given
Of setting careworn spirits free,

Of ushering souls from earth to heaven:
As downward on this blest employ

He darted on his pinions bright,

[blocks in formation]

How thrilled his heart with holy joy!

How beamed his countenance with light!

"And ever since that blessed hour

Has Death watched o'er each child of clay,
As bends above her darling flower

A tender girl, from day to day;
Till, when the long-sought bud appears,
Expanding to a lovely blossom,
She plucks it from its stem, and wears
The cherished flower upon her bosom.

"Thus tenderly Death watches over

Each struggling spirit shrined in clay,
Till, at the mandate of Jehovah,
He bears the ripened soul away.
The bond, the free, the high, the low,
Alike are objects of his love;
And though he severs hearts below,
He joins them evermore above."

- pp. 290, 291.

503

In the spring of 1847, Mr. Kennard became alarmingly ill. From this attack, however, he recovered, and remained in his usual health, though feeble and languid, till July, when nature showed itself exhausted, and yielded, probably, to "an entire functional derangement. For six days his sufferings were acute and constant, yet borne, not with patience merely, but with entire self-possession and unclouded serenity of spirit. On the morning of July 28th, having retained his consciousness to the last moment, and after several hours of entire freedom from pain, he departed this life in perfect peace."

In concluding this brief notice of a book that has profited us much, we desire to thank Mr. Peabody for his beautiful tribute to the memory of his friend and parishioner, and to repeat the hope that a second edition will be published, for the use and benefit of all.

S. K. L.

NOTE

To Article on "The Piscataqua Association of Ministers," in the Number of the Christian Examiner for May, 1848. (Fourth Series, Vol. IX. pp. 403–415.)

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

MESSRS. EDITORS, You have suggested to me the propriety of noticing, in your next number, a recent critique in the "Christian Observatory" on my sketch of the Piscataqua Association, in the Examiner for May, 1848. This I must decline doing; for I cannot consent to place myself on equal terms with an anonymous writer, who is to be identified only by the moral complexion of his article. I know the author; but he is not a man with whom I can measure weapons. Besides, of what use could a reply in the Examiner be? Very few persons read both periodicals. With those few, I simply ask that my article and that in the Observatory be read and judged together. But this latter was not written for those who had read the former.

The statements in my article, so far as they are questionable, I am prepared to defend by such evidence as in each particular case would be deemed satisfactory. There are but two modifications which need to be made as to matters of fact. One relates to the old steeples still standing over deserted churches. There is now but one such steeple within the limits of the Association. When I wrote, there were three; but two of them were burned about the time my article was printed. A fourth, which I had in my mind when I wrote, had been previously taken down, and the church beneath it modernized; but for town uses only, there having been in it almost no preaching for twelve or fifteen years. Yet a fifth has been almost forsaken for several years, the congregation, once large, meeting in a small vestry, - lacking means, energy, or both, to repair their old church or to build a new one. The other modification which I would make regards the inhabitants of Elliot, who, I am inclined to believe, were, at the commencement of Mr. Chandler's ministry, better, more thrifty, and more prosperous than I represented them. The statements with regard to them in my article embodied, however, no more than the traditions prevalent among aged people on the Portsmouth side of the Piscataqua.

A. P. P.

1849.]

Notices of Recent Publications.

505

NOTICES OF RECENT PUBLICATIONS.

History of England, from the Peace of Utrecht to the Peace of Paris. By LORD MAHON. Edited by HENRY REED, Professor of English Literature in the University of Pennsylvania. In Two Volumes. New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1849. 8vo. pp. 567, 589.

THIS edition of Lord Mahon's History of England is published under the express sanction of the noble author, and is conformable to the revised edition, issued by him in 1846. It is edited with scrupulous fidelity and accuracy, by Professor Reed, of Philadelphia, a gentleman who has already done good service. to the cause of letters in this country by his editorial supervision of several important works. His notes consist principally of extracts from works printed since the first publication of the History, or from works having particular reference to our own land, with some other matter illustrative of the text. They form a valuable addition to the original narrative, and those for which he is solely responsible are, without exception, clearly and candidly written.

Although a zealous Tory, and devoted from principle to the doctrines of that party, Lord Mahon is himself descended from one of the great Whig families of a former generation, which was connected by marriage with the elder Pitt. It is very natural, therefore, that he should feel some sympathy for the political views of his ancestors; and we are quite certain that the pride of birth has given to his book an impartiality and moderation which it would not otherwise have possessed. His party name and his family recollections draw him in opposite directions; and it is to this circumstance that the theory which underlies every part of his History is to be traced. His Lordship still cherishes the belief, which has been so successfully controverted by Mr. Macaulay and other able writers in England, that the Whigs of Queen Anne's time occupied nearly the same ground as the Tories of the present day, and that the Tories of Queen Anne's time occupied nearly the same ground as the Whigs of the present day. Indeed, he gravely asks: : - "Can it be doubted, that, at the accession of William the Fourth, Harley and St. John would have been called Whigs, Somers and Stanhope Tories? Would not the October Club have loudly cheered the measures of Lord Grey, and the Kit-Cat have found itself renewed in the Carlton?" The consequence of this most erroneous theory is, that he passes a sterner judgment on Harley than he does on Walpole, and

« VorigeDoorgaan »