Targeted Killing in International Law
OUP Oxford, 29 mei 2008 - 528 pagina's
This book conducts an in-depth analysis into the lawfulness of State-sponsored targeted killings under international human rights and humanitarian law. It also addresses the relevance of the law of inter-state force to targeted killings, and the interrelation of the various normative frameworks which may simultaneously apply to operations involving the intentional use of lethal force. Through a comprehensive analysis of treaties, custom, and general principles of law in light of jurisprudence, doctrine, and travaux preparatoires the author demonstrates that contemporary international law provides two distinct normative paradigms which govern the use of lethal force in law enforcement and in the conduct of hostilities. Based on the resulting normative paradigms, the author shows in what circumstances targeted killings may be considered as internationally lawful. The practical relevance of the various conditions and modalities is illustrated by reference to concrete examples of targeted killing from recent State practice. In essence the book argues that any targeted killing not directed against a legitimate military target remains subject to the law enforcement paradigm, which imposes extensive restraints on the practice. Even under the paradigm of hostilities, no person can be lawfully liquidated without further considerations. As a form of individualized or surgical warfare, the method of targeted killing requires a 'microscopic' interpretation of the law regulating the conduct of hostilities which leads to nuanced results. The author concludes by highlighting and comparing the main areas of concern arising with regard to State-sponsored targeted killing under each normative paradigm and by placing the results of the analysis in the wider context of the rule of law.
Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven
We hebben geen reviews gevonden op de gebruikelijke plaatsen.
Overige edities - Alles weergeven
applicable arbitrary armed forces Article 3 GC circumstances civilians combat Commentary AP Commission concept concrete conduct of hostilities constitute Court Customary IHL deprivation direct attack direct participation ECHR ECtHR example extrajudicial Force and Firearms GC III GC IV Geneva Conventions Henckaerts/Doswald-Beck human rights law IACiHR Ibid ICCPR ICRC ICTY individual international armed conflict international humanitarian law international law Israel Israel HCJ Israeli Judgment jurisdiction jus cogens law enforcement officials law enforcement paradigm legitimate military military necessity military objectives military operations non-international armed conflict normative paradigm obligation occupying power organized armed groups paradigm of hostilities paradigm of law participation in hostilities party police practice principle of distinction prohibition proportionality protection against direct Protocol II regard relevant Report requirement rescue shot rule situations of armed Special Rapporteur Executions standards State-sponsored targeted killings suspected targeted killing territory terrorist UDHR UNHRC unlawful UNSG violation weapons