Targeted Killing in International LawOUP Oxford, 29 mei 2008 - 528 pagina's This book conducts an in-depth analysis into the lawfulness of State-sponsored targeted killings under international human rights and humanitarian law. It also addresses the relevance of the law of inter-state force to targeted killings, and the interrelation of the various normative frameworks which may simultaneously apply to operations involving the intentional use of lethal force. Through a comprehensive analysis of treaties, custom, and general principles of law in light of jurisprudence, doctrine, and travaux preparatoires the author demonstrates that contemporary international law provides two distinct normative paradigms which govern the use of lethal force in law enforcement and in the conduct of hostilities. Based on the resulting normative paradigms, the author shows in what circumstances targeted killings may be considered as internationally lawful. The practical relevance of the various conditions and modalities is illustrated by reference to concrete examples of targeted killing from recent State practice. In essence the book argues that any targeted killing not directed against a legitimate military target remains subject to the law enforcement paradigm, which imposes extensive restraints on the practice. Even under the paradigm of hostilities, no person can be lawfully liquidated without further considerations. As a form of individualized or surgical warfare, the method of targeted killing requires a 'microscopic' interpretation of the law regulating the conduct of hostilities which leads to nuanced results. The author concludes by highlighting and comparing the main areas of concern arising with regard to State-sponsored targeted killing under each normative paradigm and by placing the results of the analysis in the wider context of the rule of law. |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-5 van 79
Pagina xxi
... Deprivation of Life 1.1. Conventional Texts 91 1.2. Interpretive Approach to the Term 'Arbitrary' 92 1.3. Practice of the UN Human Rights Committee 93 a) Suarez de Guerrero v Colombia (1982) 93 b) General Comment No. 6 (1982) 94 c ...
... Deprivation of Life 1.1. Conventional Texts 91 1.2. Interpretive Approach to the Term 'Arbitrary' 92 1.3. Practice of the UN Human Rights Committee 93 a) Suarez de Guerrero v Colombia (1982) 93 b) General Comment No. 6 (1982) 94 c ...
Pagina xxii
... Deprivation of Life 150 3.3. Requirement of Sufficient Legal Basis 151 3.4. Requirement of Necessity 152 3.5. Requirement of Proportionality 153 3.6. Requirement of Precaution 154 Right to Life 1. Lack of Universality of the ...
... Deprivation of Life 150 3.3. Requirement of Sufficient Legal Basis 151 3.4. Requirement of Necessity 152 3.5. Requirement of Proportionality 153 3.6. Requirement of Precaution 154 Right to Life 1. Lack of Universality of the ...
Pagina 4
... deprivation of life. Attributability to a subject of international law: Fifth, in order to be relevant under international law, targeted killings must be attributable to a subject of international law. Subjects of international law are ...
... deprivation of life. Attributability to a subject of international law: Fifth, in order to be relevant under international law, targeted killings must be attributable to a subject of international law. Subjects of international law are ...
Pagina 8
... deprivation of life.34 The word 'targeting' describes the entire process of making a target of a person, from individual selection to the application of lethal force, whereas the word 'killing' describes the ultimate aim and result of ...
... deprivation of life.34 The word 'targeting' describes the entire process of making a target of a person, from individual selection to the application of lethal force, whereas the word 'killing' describes the ultimate aim and result of ...
Pagina 14
... deprivation of life in question.22 On 24 October 1996, the German Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) dismissed complaints that the judgments of the Bundesgerichtshof violated the constitutional prohibition of ex ...
... deprivation of life in question.22 On 24 October 1996, the German Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) dismissed complaints that the judgments of the Bundesgerichtshof violated the constitutional prohibition of ex ...
Inhoudsopgave
xxxi | |
xxxv | |
xli | |
xlv | |
1 | |
B Law Enforcement | 83 |
C Hostilities | 241 |
D Conclusions | 421 |
Selected Case Descriptions | 436 |
Bibliography | 445 |
Index | 459 |
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
According activities acts actual analysis applicable arbitrary armed forces Assassination attack authority carried cause circumstances civilians combat Commentary Commission concept concerned conclusion concrete conduct of hostilities constitute Convention Court customary death December definition deprivation direct attack direct participation directly discussion distinction ECtHR effective example Executions fact Government groups human rights law humanitarian Ibid individual international armed conflict international law interpretation involved Israel Israeli Judgment jurisdiction law enforcement legitimate lethal force March means measures method military necessity necessary non-international armed conflict normative objective obligation officials operations organized paradigm participation in hostilities particular party persons police practice prevent principle prohibition proportionality protection question reasonable reference regard relevant remain Report requirement Resolution respect responsibility restrictive result rule situations Special Rapporteur specific standards suspected targeted killing territory terrorist United violation weapons