...power in order to lever open, dislocate and displace forced stabilisations into an Open multiplicity: 'if the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...constantly, or to give rise to something new, in short, to endure' (Deleuze 1986: 9). Moreover, deconstruction is all the less quarantined within the so-called...

...(MovementImage 16-17) While the set may be given in itself and in all of its parts, the whole may not, "because it is the Open, and because its nature is...constantly, or to give rise to something new, in short, to endure [durer]. ... So that each time we find ourselves confronted with a duration, or in a duration,...

...the outside, and the outside into the inside. The borders of the whole are neither closed nor open: "if the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...change constantly, or to give rise to something new" (Deleuze, 1986, p. 9). Such is the double invagination of thresholds and limits, of framing and embedment,...

...becomes, in its turn—with Deleuze writing here under the influence of Bergson — a hymn to creation: "if the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...constantly, or to give rise to something new, in short, to endure. 'The duration of the universe must therefore be one with the latitude of creation which can...

...concluded from this that the whole was a meaningless notion. Bergson's conclusion is very different: if the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...constantly, or to give rise to something new, in short, to endure. The duration of the universe must therefore be one with the latitude of creation which can...

...presents his readers with an real interpretive dilemma. 10 The citation Badiou makes runs as follows: 'if the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...its nature is to change constantly, or to give rise 216 to something new, in short, to endure' (Badiou 2000a: 49, quoting from Deleuze, Cinema 1, 1986:...

...That space of not-yet-known difference is the 'Open'. Gilles Deleuze paraphrases Bergson this way: If the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...constantly, or to give rise to something new, in short, to endure. (Deleuze, 1992: 9) To witness movement is to witness that there is a changing, open Whole -...

...That space of not-yet-know n diffetence is the 'Open'. Ciilles Oeleuze pataphtases Betgson this way: If the whole is not giveable, it is because it is the Open, and because its natute is to change constantly, ot to give tise to something new, in shott, to endute. (Deleuze, 1992:...

...never presentable in any static or finished state. It is only as a process of endless transformation. 'If the whole is not giveable, it is because it is...change constantly, or to give rise to something new.' !T Although any given moment compresses the whole of indivisible time in a passing instant or present,...