profperous scenes of life. His dress was plain linen; his houfe was thatched with ftraw, and furnished with the utmoft fimplicity; he had neither horfes nor chariots; a waggon, drawn by oxen, was his travelling carriage, when he was fent to do the emperor's business in the provinces; he never took a recompence for any service, and seemed to suffer, even when the objects of his benignity expreffed their gratitude. The mafter that perceived, approved, and advanced such merit, eclipsed by obfcurity, muft have been a good prince; we, accordingly, find here fome entertaining stories of Ou-ti, which do him honour: there are alfo in this volume examples of generofity and difinterestedness, that would do honour to any age, and are not over-abondant in ours. The story of Kao-tfou, who afcended the throne in 470, is remarkable: he had a mind to get entirely rid of the late Emperor, who was depofed, but ftill living: for this purpose he appointed a facrifice to Tien, mixed poifon with the wine that was to be offered, and fent a portion of it to the dethroned Emperor, whom, as he hoped, a principle of religion would engage to drink it; but a faithful Minifter of that unfortunate Prince, fufpecting, or knowing, the impious fraud, drank the cup for his master, and expired foon after. The dethroned Emperor was, however, foon after fuffocated in his bed by the order of Kao-tfou. It is with inexpreffible furprize that we find Father DE MAILLA drawing a pompous, panegyrical portrait of this imperial afsaffin, and, amidst a long lift of other eminent moral qualities, reprefenting him as mild, humane, and full of benignity. We are fenfible of the contradictions that are to be found in human characters, and which are often ftriking enough to excite astonishment; we also acknowledge that many unfeemly lines of character, or, at leaft, of conduct, may be fo compenfated by amiable qualities, as to deferve the favour of being caft into the fhade of Charity, that they may not tarnish the luftre of predominant virtue; but we cannot conceive that a man, capable of covering a deliberate project of murder under a folemn act of religion, and afterwards perpetrating that murder in another form, when his first stratagem mifcarried, can poffefs any of the effential lines of a good moral character: at leaft we fee nothing in the Hiftory before us that can be alleged to excufe the flattering portrait which Father DE MAILLA draws of this Emperor.

[ocr errors]

During the four firft of the five dynafties which form the materials of this volume, we find nothing but bloody revolu tions, factions breathing rage and vengeance, and objects painful to humanity. The dynafty of Tang, which afcended the throne in 619, and which brings us to the commencement of the fixth volume, put an end to thefe difgufting fcenes of fedition and carnage, and was one of the moft illuftrious and pow


[ocr errors]

erful families that have reigned in China. The second Prince of this dynafty began his reign by difmiffing three thousand concubines of the palace *. Tai-tfong, of the fame dynasty, who reigned in the year 626, was a Prince of diftinguished merit. One of the great men of the empire presented to him a petition, requesting the removal of flatterers from his prefence, telling him, at the fame time, that if he had a mind to know them, he had only to propofe in council fomething prejudicial to the public good, and infift upon its immediate execution, and that thus he would fee who they were, whom a fervile adulation led to pay him a blind obedience. I acknowledge, answered the Emperor, that the method is fure; but if á fovereign employs ftratagems and cunning with his counsellors, how can he re•quire or expect uprightnefs and candour from them? A Prince is like the fpring of the rivulet, and his officers may be confidered as the ftream that flows from it: if the fpring or fountain-head is pure and limpid, the ftream will be pure and limpid alfo be fides, I have always had an averfion to those infidious methods of proceeding that corrupt the candour of the heart. I would rather remain ignorant of what may be wrong, if wrong there be, than discover it by means that are chargeable with duplicity, and are unworthy of that frankness

* According to the precepts of the book Li-Ki, an Emperor (exclufive of his fpoufe whom he creates Emprefs) may have 130 concubines three who are called Foug-in, nine, who have the appellation of Pin, thirty-feven, who bear the name of Chi-Fou, eightyone, who are denominated Yu-Th. The Emperors, during a long fpace of time, far exceeded this number; fo far, that when TeinOu-ti reduced the whole of the empire under his obedience, the number of his concubines amounted to ten thousand.

We find here a note of the Editors, which difcovers the pains they take to throw light upon the text of the Annals, and to make their readers acquainted with the manners and customs of the court of Pekin. "The Foug-in (fay they) are a kind of Queens, who by the honours they receive are diftinguished from the other ladies (concubines) of the palace. The three Foug-in, are ordinarily women of royal birth; this, at leaf, is now the cafe under the government of the Manchew Tartars. They have a dwelling apart; a court, two maids of honour, and other perfons of the fair fex in their fervice. They have a brilliant fuite of attendance, and no expence is fpared to render their apartments and furniture as magnificent as is poffible. All their children are legitimate, and are called Magalhaens; and the only circumstance, by which they are diftinguifhed from thofe of the Emprefs is, the preference given to the latter in the fucceffion to the empire. The Empress lodges in the fame palace with the Emperor: the other ladies have their feparate palaces. Thefe women and concubines never appear to any eye, but thofe of the Mo



and candour which are fo earnestly recommended by our ancient fages."

Our Historian mentions, among other lines of wisdom and humanity in the character and conduct of this excellent Prince, .one that, alas! seems to be totally unknown to the Princes and Sovereigns of this philofophical age, or, if known, to be totally neglected what that was the Reader will fee in the following paffage: "In deliberating with his nobles about the means of prolonging the peace, which his fubjects enjoyed, he thought that the most effectual would be to diminish his expences, to lighten the burthen of taxation, to employ mild and conciliating measures, and to inquire diligently into the wants of his people in order to fupply them. There is no King, said he, without a kingdom, and what is it that conflitutes a kingdom, but -the people? Therefore, to oppress the people, and to ruin them in order to fatisfy the avarice and paffions of a Sovereign, is like a perfon's cutting off his own flesh in order to appease the hungry cravings of his ftomach the ftomach of fuch a perfon is, indeed, fatiated for a time, but the body perishes.—Such is the cafe of thofe Princes, who enrich themselves at the expence of their fubjects. The calamities and ruin of a country proceed oftener from INTERNAL TROUBLES than from FOREIGN WARS. The Monarch who oppreffes his people excites murmurs, and murmurs lead to fedition." The words and actions of this good Prince, which are recorded by our Hiftorian, deserve to be read in the work itself. His name ftruck terror into the Tartars, while it was pronounced by his fubjects with delight, and by the neighbouring nations with veneration. Under his reign the inhabitants of China were numbered, and the extent of the empire determined; but our Author's account of its dimenfions is not very clear. Tai-tong reigned 23 years, and poffeffed fo entirely the hearts of his fubjects, that his dynafty poffeffed the throne a century longer than all the five preceding dynafties had done. But his fucceffors did not resemble him; they often reduced the dynafty, by their unworthy conduct, to the brink of deftruction, and it was only the affection excited in the people for his family, on his account, that could make them bear patiently the follies and foibles of his defcendants. One of thefe, the Empress Ou-Heou, dethroned her own fon, put in his place another, whom the kept chained and imprisoned; and thus governed, folely, amidst plots and affaffinations, that vaft empire, which the rendered formidable, but not happy. It is farther obfervable, that un. der this dynafty,, the eunuchs of the palace acquired fuch an afcendant in the chief branches of the adminiftration, that, more than once, they made their mafters tremble, triumphed over the efforts of defpotifm, difconcerted the plots laid for their deftruction,

deftruction, and were, at length, one of the principal causes of the downfall of the dynasty of the Tang.

It was, alfo, during the dynafty of Tang, and in the year 726, that the Emperor Hiven-Tong ordered a lift to be made of the number of families throughout the empire, that were not employed in his fervice or in that of the government, and they were found to amount to 7,069,565 Chinese families, which made, in all, 41,419,712 fouls. In the year 754 this political operation was extended to the towns as well as families, and there appeared to be then in China 321 cities of the firft order, 1538 of the fecond, exclufive of smaller towns and villages, and 9,619,254 families, which made, in all, 52,880,488 fouls. Thus, in the space of 29 years, the population of China increased above eleven millions. In the year 846, which was 86 years after, a like numbering yielded no more than 4,996,722 families; and another made five years after, yielded 41,600 families less than the preceding. If these facts are true, and the eftimates were well made, this diminution must appear afstonishing, more especially when it is confidered, that, in the intervals between thefe different periods, there was neither war, peftilence, nor any confiderablé fcarcity or famine, which latter circumftance is known to produce frequently fudden changes in the population of China. Having mentioned the population of China under the dynafty of Tang, it may not be improper to give, from our Author, the ftate of its revenues during this period. In the year 852, Siven-Tfong ordered an exact account to be drawn up of the money that entered annually into his treasury; and it appeared that his annual revenue (the duties on falt and wine included) amounted to between four and five millions fterling. It is to be observed that grain, filks, and feveral other commodities, which make a part of the imperial income, do not enter into this account.


We do not understand Father DE MAILLA's account of the extent of the Chinese empire under the dynasty of the Tang; nor do we know the fituation of the places by which he terminates it. He fays it extended from the Eastern Sea to the Weft of the kingdom of Yen-Chi, and from the kingdom of Lin-y in the South to the country of Tamo in the North; and that, of confequence, its extent was 9510 leagues from Eaft to Weft, and 10,918 from North to South.-There is a map of ancient China annexed to this volume, whofe proper place is the first volume of the work; it is more circumftantial, more accurate, and better compofed, than that which Father Amiot prefixed to the fecond volume of the Memoirs concerning China, and gives lefs extent to that empire.

The feventh volume comprehends a period, beginning with the year 888, and ending with the year 959 of the Chriftian APP. Rev. Vol. Ix. LI


era. In this fhort period of 71 years we fee, befides the two laft Emperors of the famous dynasty of Tang, five dynasties filling fucceffively the imperial throne, and exhibiting the most odious and barbarous fcenes of perfidy, corruption, rebellion, and carnage, that have ever been known in any nation or period of the world. Nevertheless, in the midft of thefe abominable enormities and diforders, we find examples of heroism and virtue, that adminifter fome little refreshment and confolation to the difgufted reader. These commotions are adapted to remove, at least, some of the prejudices in favour of the Chinese, to which the accounts of the Miffionaries have given rife; for if we credit the relations of thefe Fathers, we may be led to think that tranquillity, and concord have always reigned in China, nay, that they are the diftinctive characters of that happy nation. Some examples will rectify the erroneous judgments which many of our Readers may have entertained on this head.

[ocr errors]

Tchao-tfong, who may be confidered as the laft Emperor of -the dynafty of Tang, had refolved to reform the government, which was in the greatest disorder; but his moft vigorous enIdeavours were infufficient to controul that fpirit of independence which reigned among the governors of the provinces; and when, in China, matters are come to fuch a pafs, there is no remedy but the entire deftruction of the reigning dynafty. The eunuchs had acquired fuch á monftrous afcendant as to arrest and depose the Emperor, to place his infant-heir upon the throne, and to ftrangle all who adhered to the captive Prince. Tchou-ouen came to his affiftance, delivered him from prifon, put to death feveral thousands of the eunuchs-and what then? Why, then, he availed himfelf of the weakness of the Prince to whose succour he was come, maffacred his guards, and put others in their place, who murdered the Prince, and placed on the throne Tchao-fiven-ti, fon of Tchao-tfong, who had no more than the title of Emperor. The brothers of this titular Monarch were invited to a feaft on the borders of a lake, where they were all perfidiously ftrangled, and their carcases thrown into the water. All these enormities were executed by the order of Tchou ouen, and, that they might not be imputed to him, he gave only a verbal order to the officers who were the inftruments of his barbarity: nay, he went fo far as to order all thefe officers, together with one of his own fons, to be facrificed, in a pretended fit of affliction and despair: but as he was much fufpected of having brought about the death of the Emperor, he made ufe of the appearance of a comet, which furnifhed him with an opportunity of putting to death a great number of those who cenfured his conduct. At length he forced the young Emperor to abdicate the throne, and to tranf


[ocr errors]
« VorigeDoorgaan »