The Democratic ParadoxVerso, 2000 - 143 pagina's "Drawing on the work of Wittgenstein and Derrida, and engaging with the provocative theses of Carl Schmitt, she proposes a new understanding of democracy in terms of 'agonistic pluralism' which acknowledges the ineradicability of antagonsim and the impossibility of a final resolution of conflicts." --Cover. |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-5 van 32
Pagina xii
... deliberative democracy ' approach is at pains to deny . It was while reading these texts again for publication that I realized that , albeit in different ways , all of them were highlight- ing the paradoxical nature of modern liberal ...
... deliberative democracy ' approach is at pains to deny . It was while reading these texts again for publication that I realized that , albeit in different ways , all of them were highlight- ing the paradoxical nature of modern liberal ...
Pagina 7
... democracy as the realization of a ' rational consensus ' and on the concomitant illusion that left and right have ceased to be perti- nent categories ... deliberative democracy ' and the proposals for 7 INTRODUCTION : THE DEMOCRATIC PARADOX.
... democracy as the realization of a ' rational consensus ' and on the concomitant illusion that left and right have ceased to be perti- nent categories ... deliberative democracy ' and the proposals for 7 INTRODUCTION : THE DEMOCRATIC PARADOX.
Pagina 8
Chantal Mouffe. theories of ' deliberative democracy ' and the proposals for a ' third way politics ' is unable to grasp the dynamics of modern demo- cratic politics which lies in the confrontation between the two components of the ...
Chantal Mouffe. theories of ' deliberative democracy ' and the proposals for a ' third way politics ' is unable to grasp the dynamics of modern demo- cratic politics which lies in the confrontation between the two components of the ...
Pagina 14
... democracy as ' agonistic pluralism ' . Besides allowing me to counter Schmitt's argument about the inconsistency of the idea of pluralist democracy , it helps me to bring to the fore the limitations both of the theorists of ' deliberative ...
... democracy as ' agonistic pluralism ' . Besides allowing me to counter Schmitt's argument about the inconsistency of the idea of pluralist democracy , it helps me to bring to the fore the limitations both of the theorists of ' deliberative ...
Pagina 32
De content van deze pagina is beperkt.
De content van deze pagina is beperkt.
Inhoudsopgave
Democracy Power and The Political | 17 |
Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy | 34 |
Wittgenstein Political Theory and Democracy | 58 |
For an Agonistic Model of Democracy | 78 |
A Politics Without Adversary? | 106 |
The Ethics of Democracy | 127 |
Index | 139 |
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
acknowledge adversary advocated agonistic pluralism agreement antagonism approach argue argument articulation assertion Benhabib Carl Schmitt central Chantal Mouffe citizens citizenship common conflict constitutive cratic critique crucial decisions deliberation deliberative democracy deliberative model democ democracy requires democratic institutions democratic society demos Derrida dimension discourse eliminated entails envisage equality Ernesto Laclau establish ethics exclusion exist fact framework frontier globalization grasp Habermas homogeneity human Ibid idea ideal identity important impossibility ineradicable interests issue John Rawls Jürgen Habermas language-games left/right legitimacy legitimate liberal democracy liberal-democratic liberties limits logic model of democratic modern democracy moral nature neo-liberal overlapping consensus paradox perspective pluralism of values pluralist democracy political liberalism political theory popular sovereignty possible principles problem procedures public sphere racy rational consensus rationalist Rawls's realization regime Richard Rorty rule Seyla Benhabib Slavoj Žižek social democracy specific struggle tension theorists tion traditional understanding unity Wittgenstein Wittgensteinian