The Democratic ParadoxVerso, 2000 - 143 pagina's "Drawing on the work of Wittgenstein and Derrida, and engaging with the provocative theses of Carl Schmitt, she proposes a new understanding of democracy in terms of 'agonistic pluralism' which acknowledges the ineradicability of antagonsim and the impossibility of a final resolution of conflicts." --Cover. |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-5 van 8
Pagina 2
... popular sovereignty , are different . Indeed , the separation between church and state , between the realm of the public and that of the private , as well as the very idea of the Rechtsstaat , which are central to the politics of ...
... popular sovereignty , are different . Indeed , the separation between church and state , between the realm of the public and that of the private , as well as the very idea of the Rechtsstaat , which are central to the politics of ...
Pagina 3
... popular sovereignty . There is no necessary relation between those two distinct traditions but only a contingent historical articulation . Through such an articulation , as C. B. MacPherson was keen to emphasize , liberalism was ...
... popular sovereignty . There is no necessary relation between those two distinct traditions but only a contingent historical articulation . Through such an articulation , as C. B. MacPherson was keen to emphasize , liberalism was ...
Pagina 4
Chantal Mouffe. the element of popular sovereignty , which is deemed to be obsolete . This has created a ' democratic deficit ' which , given the central role played by the idea of popular sovereignty in the democratic imaginary , can ...
Chantal Mouffe. the element of popular sovereignty , which is deemed to be obsolete . This has created a ' democratic deficit ' which , given the central role played by the idea of popular sovereignty in the democratic imaginary , can ...
Pagina 8
... popular partici- pation . According to Habermas such a conflict ceases to exist once one realizes the ' co - originality ' of fundamental human rights and of popular sovereignty . However , as I indicate , neither Rawls nor Habermas is ...
... popular partici- pation . According to Habermas such a conflict ceases to exist once one realizes the ' co - originality ' of fundamental human rights and of popular sovereignty . However , as I indicate , neither Rawls nor Habermas is ...
Pagina 18
De content van deze pagina is beperkt.
De content van deze pagina is beperkt.
Inhoudsopgave
Democracy Power and The Political | 17 |
Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy | 34 |
Wittgenstein Political Theory and Democracy | 58 |
For an Agonistic Model of Democracy | 78 |
A Politics Without Adversary? | 106 |
The Ethics of Democracy | 127 |
Index | 139 |
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
acknowledge adversary advocated agonistic pluralism agreement antagonism approach argue argument articulation assertion Benhabib Carl Schmitt central Chantal Mouffe citizens citizenship common conflict constitutive cratic critique crucial decisions deliberation deliberative democracy deliberative model democ democracy requires democratic institutions democratic society demos Derrida dimension discourse eliminated entails envisage equality Ernesto Laclau establish ethics exclusion exist fact framework frontier globalization grasp Habermas homogeneity human Ibid idea ideal identity important impossibility ineradicable interests issue John Rawls Jürgen Habermas language-games left/right legitimacy legitimate liberal democracy liberal-democratic liberties limits logic model of democratic modern democracy moral nature neo-liberal overlapping consensus paradox perspective pluralism of values pluralist democracy political liberalism political theory popular sovereignty possible principles problem procedures public sphere racy rational consensus rationalist Rawls's realization regime Richard Rorty rule Seyla Benhabib Slavoj Žižek social democracy specific struggle tension theorists tion traditional understanding unity Wittgenstein Wittgensteinian