 | 1917 - 510 pagina’s
...government itself and that of the states. It would not be contend"'1 **"* exceptions, it is not percei\red that there is any limit to the questions which can be adjusted touching any matter which is proper!}' the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." These statements of Prof. Story and Justice... | |
 | 1920 - 1086 pagina’s
...one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter (that is, of the State) without its consent. But with these exceptions it...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." I think you will see that that is pretty wide language. Now, this treaty-making power has been the... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1919 - 250 pagina’s
...of the territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Ry. vs. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country, Ware vs. Hylton, (3. Dall.) 199; Chirac vs. Chirac, 15 US (2 Wheat.) 259; Houenstein vs. Lynham, 100... | |
 | 1890 - 1130 pagina’s
...of the latter, without Ite consent. Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 U. S. 525, 541, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 995. But, with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Wure v. Hylton,3Dall. 199; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; HauenBtein v. Lynham, 100 US 483 ; 8 Ops.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 778 pagina’s
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...matter which is properly the . -subject of negotiation Avith a foreign country. Ware v. I/ylton, 3 Ball. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; ffauenstein... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1890 - 784 pagina’s
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 US 483 ; 8... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - 1894 - 470 pagina’s
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5tl. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. H niton, 3 Dall. 199; Chirac v. Ch,rac, 2 Wheat 259; Hanensle,n v. Lynliam, 100 US 483; 8 Opinions... | |
 | Emlin McClain - 1900 - 1126 pagina’s
...territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...the subject of negotiation with a foreign country. Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199 ; Chirac r. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259 ; Hauenstein r. Lynham, 100 US 483; 8... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1900 - 792 pagina’s
...forbids, or a change in the character of the Government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without...exceptions it is not perceived that there is any limit to it touching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiations with a, foreign country." My conclusion... | |
 | Emlin McClain - 1900 - 1134 pagina’s
...territory of the latter without its consent. Fort I,,cavenworth Hailroad Co. r. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5+1. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that there is any limit to tho questions which can be adjusted tonching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiation... | |
| |
It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent.... 
