The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body

Voorkant
David Fredrick
JHU Press, 18 nov 2002 - 334 pagina's
0 Recensies
Reviews worden niet geverifieerd, maar Google checkt wel op nepcontent en verwijdert zulke content als die wordt gevonden.

The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body uses the concept of "the gaze" to examine literary, visual, and material evidence that reveals the contribution of ancient Rome to the development of Western culture. Contributors draw upon a wide range of theoretical methods, using visual and body theory from various fields and period specializations. Topics include violence and gender in Senecan theater, literary representations of erotic love within a hierarchical and violent Rome, and the differing appeal of artistic depictions designed for visual consumption by both genders. Boldly interdisciplinary, The Roman Gaze will interest readers in history, classics, literature, art, and cinema.

Contributors: Carlin Barton, Cindy Benton, John R. Clarke, Anthony Corbeill, Katherine Owen Eldred, David Fredrick, Pamela Gordon, Zahra Newby, and Alison R. Sharrock.

 

Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven

We hebben geen reviews gevonden op de gebruikelijke plaatsen.

Geselecteerde pagina's

Inhoudsopgave

Split Vision The Politics of the Gaze in Senecas Troades
31
This Ship of Fools Epic Vision in Lucans Vulteius Ep
57
Some Unseen Monster Rereading Lucretius on Sex
86
Reading Programs in GrecoRoman Art Reflections on the Spada Reliefs
110
Look Whos Laughing at Sex Men and Women Viewers in the Apodyterium of the Suburban Baths at Pompeii
149
Political Movement Walking and Ideology in Republican Rome
182
Being in the Eyes Shame and Sight in Ancient Rome
216
Mapping Penetrability in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome
236
Looking at Looking Can You Resist a Reading?
265
Bibliography
297
Index
323
Copyright

Overige edities - Alles bekijken

Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen

Populaire passages

Pagina 82 - Sadism demands a story, depends on making something happen, forcing a change in another person, a battle of will and strength, victory /defeat, all occurring in a linear time with a beginning and an end.
Pagina 235 - Quid scribam vobis, patres conscripti, aut quo modo scribam aut quid omnino non scribam hoc tempore, di me deaeque peius perdant, quam perire me cotidie sentio, si scio.
Pagina 235 - Neque frustra praestantissimus sapientiae firmare solitus est, si recludantur tyrannorum mentes, posse aspici laniatus et ictus, quando ut corpora verberibus, ita saevitia, libidine, mails consultis animus dilaceretur.
Pagina 93 - ... osculaque adfligunt, quia non est pura voluptas et stimuli subsunt qui instigant laedere id ipsum, quodcumque est, rabies unde illaec germina surgunt.
Pagina 99 - No lewdness, narrowing envy, monkey-spite, No madness of ambition, avarice, none; No larger feast than under plane or pine With neighbors laid along the grass, to take Only such cups as left us friendly-warm, Affirming each his own philosophy— Nothing to mar the sober majesties Of settled, sweet, Epicurean life.
Pagina 184 - It is because agents never know completely what they are doing that what they do has more sense than they know.
Pagina 83 - Hi quis ades longis serus spectator ab oris, cui lux prima sacri muneris ista fuit, ne te decipiat ratibus navalis Enyo et par unda fretis, hic modo terra fuit. non credis ? specta, dum lassant aequora Martem : 5 parva mora est, dices 'Hic modo pontus erat.
Pagina 14 - One part of a fragmented body destroys the Renaissance space, the illusion of depth demanded by the narrative; it gives flatness, the quality of a cut-out or icon, rather than verisimilitude, to the screen.
Pagina 84 - Curam acuebat quod adversus Latinos bellandum erat, lingua, moribus, armorum genere, institutis ante omnia militaribus, congruentes ; milites militibus, centurionibus centuriones, tribuni tribunis compares collegaeque iisdem in8 praesidiis, saepe iisdem mani16 pulis permixti fuerant.
Pagina 40 - Quid me existimas dicere ? avarior redeo, ambitiosior, luxuriosior ? immo vero crudelior et inhumanior, quia inter homines fui.

Over de auteur (2002)

David Fredrick is an associate professor in the Department of Foreign Languages at the University of Arkansas.

Bibliografische gegevens