Pagina-afbeeldingen
PDF
ePub

ment which I have formed of your lordship's character, and of its public value: my personal obligations I can never forget. Under a due sense of both these considerations, I beg leave to subscribe myself, with great respect and gratitude, - - My lord, Your lordship's faithful And most devoted servent, WILLIAM PALEY.

Bishof. Wearmouth,
July, 1802.

VI. The Argument Cumulative ... . . . . . . . . .

VII. Of the JMechanical and Immechanical Func-

[merged small][ocr errors]

o

Frame—Of the Bones . . . . . . . . .

IX. Of the Muscles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X. Of the Vessels of Animal Bodies . . . . . . .

XI. Of the Animal Structure regarded as a Mass

XII Comparative Anatomy . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XIII. Peculiar Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XIV. Prospective Contrivances . . . . . . . . . . . .

XV. Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XVI. Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XVII. The Relation of Animated Bodies to Inani-

mate Nature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XVIII. Instincts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

XIX. Of Insects . . . . . * * * * * * , • * * * * * * * *

XX. Of Plants . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - .

XXI. Of the Elements . . . . . . . . . * * * * * * * *

XXII. Astronomy . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - -

XXIII. Personality of the Deity . . . . . . . . . . . .

XXIV. Of the Natural Attributes of the Deity . . . .

XXV. Of the Unity of the Deity . . . . . . . - - - - -

XXVI. The Goodness of the Deity . . . . . . . . . .

XXVII

• Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - -

63

82

98

121

137

I56

164

170

179

189

194

207

237

244

262

233

288

292

341

[merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

IN crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stome, and were asked how the stone came to be there, I might possibly answer, that, for any thing I knew to the contrary, it had lain there forever: nor would it perhaps be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer. But suppose I had found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I should hardly think of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch, as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not. discover in the stone) that its several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, e. g. that they are so formed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day; that, if the several parts had been differently

B

shaped from what they are, of a different size from what they are, or placed after apy other manner, or in any other order, than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use, that is now served by it. To reckon up a few of the plainest of these parts, and of their offices, all tending to one result:—We see a cylindrical box containing a coiled elastic spring, which, by its endeavour to relax itself, turns round the box. We next observe a flexible chain (artificially wrought for the sake of flexure) communicating the action of the spring from the box to the fusee. We then find a series of wheels, the teeth of which, catch in, and apply to, each other, conducting the motion from the fusee to the balance, and from the balance to the pointer; and at the same time, by the size and shape of those wheels, so regulating that motion, as to terminate in causing an index, by an equable and measured progression, to pass over a given space in a given time. We take notice that the wheels are made of brass, in order to keep them from rust; the springs of steel, no other metal being so elastic; that over the face of the watch there is placed a glass, a material employed in no other part of the work, but, in the room of which, if there had been any other than a transparent substance, the hour could not be seen without opening the case. This mechanism being observed (it requires indeed an examination of the instrument, and perhaps some previous knowledge of the subject, to perceive and understand it; but being once, as we have said, observed and understood), the inference, we think, is inevitable; that the watch must have had a maker; that there must have existed, at some time and at some place or other, an artificer or artificers, who formed it for the purpose which we find it actually to answer; who comprehended its construction, and designed its use. I. Nor would it, I apprehend, weaken the conclusion, that we had never seen a watch made; that we had never known an artist capable of making one;

« VorigeDoorgaan »