Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and PoliticsCambridge University Press, 12 apr 2004 - 342 pagina's Building on a survey of media institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies, Hallin and Mancini identify the principal dimensions of variation in media systems and the political variables which have shaped their evolution. They go on to identify three major models of media system development (the Polarized Pluralist, Democratic Corporatist and Liberal models) to explain why the media have played a different role in politics in each of these systems, and to explore the forces of change that are currently transforming them. It provides a key theoretical statement about the relation between media and political systems, a key statement about the methodology of comparative analysis in political communication and a clear overview of the variety of media institutions that have developed in the West, understood within their political and historical context. |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-5 van 84
Pagina
... institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies, Hallin and Mancini identify the principal dimensions of variation in media systems and the political variables that have shaped their evolution. They go on to ...
... institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies, Hallin and Mancini identify the principal dimensions of variation in media systems and the political variables that have shaped their evolution. They go on to ...
Pagina
... institutions, those of Western Europe and North America. We do believe that much of the analysis will be of interest to those studying other regions, and we will say a little about how we see our models in relation to the rest of the ...
... institutions, those of Western Europe and North America. We do believe that much of the analysis will be of interest to those studying other regions, and we will say a little about how we see our models in relation to the rest of the ...
Pagina
... institutions are adjusted . We believe that an understanding of these aspects of society is basic to any systematic understanding of the press " ( 1-2 ) . Here again , we think the problem is well posed . We shall follow the agenda set ...
... institutions are adjusted . We believe that an understanding of these aspects of society is basic to any systematic understanding of the press " ( 1-2 ) . Here again , we think the problem is well posed . We shall follow the agenda set ...
Pagina
... institutions is one reason scholars in comparative politics have begun to pay attention to media institutions they previously ignored. It is worth noting that, just as communication scholars have paid little attention to comparative ...
... institutions is one reason scholars in comparative politics have begun to pay attention to media institutions they previously ignored. It is worth noting that, just as communication scholars have paid little attention to comparative ...
Pagina
... institutions evolve over time; at each step of their evolution past events and institutional patterns inherited from earlier periods influence the direction they take. We shall see, for example, that there is a strong correlation ...
... institutions evolve over time; at each step of their evolution past events and institutional patterns inherited from earlier periods influence the direction they take. We shall see, for example, that there is a strong correlation ...
Inhoudsopgave
The Political Context of Media Systems | |
Media and Political Systems and the Question of Differentiation | |
The Three Models | |
The NorthCentral European or Democratic Corporatist Model | |
The North Atlantic or Liberal Model | |
The Forces and Limits of Homogenization | |
Conclusion | |
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics Daniel C. Hallin,Paolo Mancini Gedeeltelijke weergave - 2004 |
Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics Daniel C. Hallin,Paolo Mancini Geen voorbeeld beschikbaar - 2004 |
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
advertising American argued Britain British broadcasting systems central Chapter characteristics characterized clientelism commercial broadcasting commercial media comparative analysis connected corporatism coverage democracy democratic corporatism Democratic Corporatist countries Democratic Corporatist Model differentiation theory discussion distinct dominant early economic European example external pluralism France French Germany global ideological important increasingly influence institutions interests Italian Italy journalism journalistic autonomy journalistic professionalism Liberal countries Liberal Model majoritarian mass circulation mass media media and political media markets media systems Mediterranean countries neutral newspaper circulation norms organized social groups papers particularly pattern percent polarized pluralism political culture political parallelism political parties political system Portugal press freedom proportional representation PSOE public broadcasting public broadcasting systems public service broadcasting rational-legal authority readership regulation relatively role significant society Southern Europe Spain strong strongly structure subsidies Sweden tabloid television tend three models trade unions tradition twentieth century United