It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do : good Christians content themselves with His will revealed in His word ; so it is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this or that... Outlines of Mediaeval & Modern History ... - Pagina 499door Philip Van Ness Myers - 1888 - 740 pagina’sVolledige weergave - Over dit boek
| Daniel Neal, Edward Parsons - 1811 - 664 pagina’s
...to limit his power, which it was not lawful for ihc tongue of a lawyer, nor any subject to dispute. As it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do, says he, so it is presumption, and an high contempt to dispute what Kings can do or stfy ; it is to... | |
| Daniel Neal - 1817 - 612 pagina’s
...limit his power, which it was not * lawful for the tongue of a lawyer, nor any subject to dis' pute. As it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what •God can do, says he, so it is presumption, and an high ' contempt, to dispute what kings can do or say; it is to... | |
| Daniel Neal - 1817 - 656 pagina’s
...limit his power, which it was not ' lawful for the tongue of a lawyer, nor any subject to dis' pute. As it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what * God can do, says he, so it is presumption, and an high * contempt, to dispute what kings can do or say; it is to... | |
| 1822 - 382 pagina’s
...do ; good Christians content themselves with his will revealed in his word; so it's presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this, or that ; but rest in that which is the king's revealed will in the... | |
| Henry Hallam - 1827 - 538 pagina’s
...do; good Christians content themselves with his will revealed in his word ; so it is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do , or say that a king cannot do this or that. " King James's Works, p. 557. It is probable that his familiar... | |
| Daniel Neal - 1837 - 704 pagina’s
...to limit his power, which it was not lawful for the tongue of a lawyer nor any subject to dispute. As it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do (says he), so it is presumption, and a high contempt, to dispute what kings can do or say ; it is to... | |
| 1902 - 874 pagina’s
...subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor Is lawful to be disputed." and that It is "presumption and high contempt In a subject to dispute what a king can do or say that a king cannot do this." Scarcely less strange to modern ears Is the speech of Charles I. when... | |
| 1849 - 362 pagina’s
...the law, is a satisfactory exposition of his principles on this head. Briefly they were these : that as it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do, so it is presumption and high contempt to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this or that... | |
| James Goodeve Miall - 1851 - 382 pagina’s
...to limit his power ; which it is not lawful for the tongue of a lawyer nor any subject to dispute. As it is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do, so it is presumption and high contempt to dispute what kings can do or say : it is to take away that mystical... | |
| Hannah Lawrance - 1852 - 274 pagina’s
...saxteen, ' as good Christians content themselves wi' God's will as revealed in his word, so it is ane high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king canna do it.' " " Most undoubtedly, sire," replied the bishop ; while the gifted chancellor,... | |
| |