Generative MorphologyCinnaminson, N.J., 1984 - 237 pagina's The architecture of the human language faculty has been one of the main foci of the linguistic research of the last half century. This branch of linguistics, broadly known as Generative Grammar, is concerned with the formulation of explanatory formal accounts of linguistic phenomena with the ulterior goal of gaining insight into the properties of the 'language organ'. The series comprises high quality monographs and collected volumes that address such issues. The topics in this series range from phonology to semantics, from syntax to information structure, from mathematical linguistics to studies of the lexicon. |
Vanuit het boek
Resultaten 1-3 van 81
Pagina 81
... Affixes In relation to the morphology of English , many linguists accept a distinc- tion between two classes of affixes , referred to as Class I and Class II . The distinction is based on the following differences in the behavior of the ...
... Affixes In relation to the morphology of English , many linguists accept a distinc- tion between two classes of affixes , referred to as Class I and Class II . The distinction is based on the following differences in the behavior of the ...
Pagina 87
... affixes may be attached only to stressed words ( i.e. there are no unstressed words at the point Level II affixation applies ) . In addition , they show why Level II affixes are stress - neutral ( i.e. the cyclic stress rules operate ...
... affixes may be attached only to stressed words ( i.e. there are no unstressed words at the point Level II affixation applies ) . In addition , they show why Level II affixes are stress - neutral ( i.e. the cyclic stress rules operate ...
Pagina 88
Sergio Scalise. distinction between + affixes and #affixes , but rather all affixes may be considered to have a “ + ” boundary . Strauss's hypothesis , however , has a rather undesirable consequence as will be shown . According to ...
Sergio Scalise. distinction between + affixes and #affixes , but rather all affixes may be considered to have a “ + ” boundary . Strauss's hypothesis , however , has a rather undesirable consequence as will be shown . According to ...
Inhoudsopgave
Word formation as transformations | 8 |
Summary | 14 |
Prolegomena to a theory of word formation Halle 1973 | 23 |
Copyright | |
20 andere gedeelten niet getoond
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
abstract according adjectives Allen allomorphy apply argument Aronoff Aronoff's proposal Base Hypothesis Blocking Rule Booij boundary change the syntactic Chapter Chomsky Class clitics complex word counterexamples criticism derivation and inflection derivational rules derived words Dictionary discussed Dutch element English evaluative suffixes example existent words fact formedness furthermore given grammar Halle's Infl inflected word inflection Inflection Rules inflectional morphemes internal structure Italian languages lexical category lexical component Lexical Insertion lexical items lexical morphology Lexicalist Hypothesis lexicon Lieber linguistic List of Morphemes loose compounds meaning morphological component morphological rules Muysken nouns operate Ordering Hypothesis output Output Hypothesis parasynthetics phonological rules phrase phrase structure rules plural possible Pre+ prefix problem processes productive Readjustment Rules relation restrictions RR's Scalise seen Selkirk semantic sentences Siegel specific stems stress rules subcategorization frame suffix syntactic category transitive verbs WFR's Word Formation Rules X-bar theory Zwanenburg