[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

question or suspicion as to the reasoning which we institute concerning the mechanical part of our frame. That an animal is a machine, is a proposition neither correctly true nor wholly false. The distinction which we have been discussing will serve to show how far the comparison, which this expression implies, holds; and wherein it fails. And whether the distinction be thought of importance or not, it is certainly of importance to remember, that there is neither truth nor Justice in endeavouring to bring a cloud over our understandings, or a distrust into our reasonings upon this subject, by suggesting that we know nothing of voluntary motion, of irritability, of the principle of life, of sensation, of animal heat, upon all which the animal functions depend ; for, our ignorance of these parts of the animal frame concerns not at all our knowledge of the mechanical parts of the same frame. I contend, therefore, that there is mechanism in animals; that this mechanism is as properly such, as it is in machines made by art; that this mechanism is intelligible and certain; that it is not the less so, because it often begins or terminates with something which is not mechanical; that whenever it is intelligible and certain, it demonstrates intention and contrivance, as well in the works of nature, as in those of art; and that it is the best demonstration which either can afford.

But whilst I contend for these propositions, I do not exclude myself from asserting, that there may be, and that there are, other cases, in which, although we cannot exhibit mechanism, or prove indeed that mechanism is employed, we want not sufficient evidence to conduct us to the same conclusion.

There is what may be called the chymical part of our framie; of which, by reason of the imperfection of our

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

chymistry, we can attain to no distinct knowledge; I mean, not to a knowledge, either in degree or kind, similar to that which we possess of the mechanical part of our frame. It does not, therefore, afford the same species of argument as that which mechanism affords; and yet it may afford an argument in a high degree satisfactory. The gastric juice, or the liquor which digests the food in the stomachs of animals is of this class. Of all menstrua, it is the most active, the most universal. "In the human stomach, for instance, consider what a variety of strange substances, and how widely different from one another, it, in' a few hours, reduces to a uniform pulp, milk, or mucilage. " It seizes upon every thing, it dissolves the texture of almost every thing, that comes in its way. The flesh of perhaps all animals; the seeds and fruits of the greatest number of plants; the roots, and stalks, and leaves of many, hard and tough as they are, yield to its powerful pervasion. The change wrought by it is different from any chyrnical solution which we can produce, or with which we are acquainted, in this respect as well as many others, that, in our chymistry, particular menstrua act only upon particular substances. Consider moreover that this fluid, stronger in its operation than a caustic alkali or mineral acid, than red precipitate, or aqua-fortis itself, is nevertheless as mild, and bland, and inoffensive to the touch or taste, as saliva or gum-water, which it much resembles. Consider, I say, these several properties of the digestive organ, and of the juice with which it is supplied, or rather with which it is made to supply itself, and you will confess it to be entitled to a name, which it has sometimes received, that of " the chymical wonder of animal nature."

Still we are ignorant of the composition of this fiuidl, and of the mode of its action; by which is meant that

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]


[ocr errors]

we are not capable, as we are in the mechanical part of our frame, of collating it with the operations of art. And this I call the imperfection of our chymistry; for, should the time ever arrive, which is not perhaps to be despaired of, when we can compound ingredients, so as to form a solvent which will act in the manner in which the gastric juice acts, we may be able to ascertain the chymical principles upon which its efficacy slepends, as well as from what part, and by what concoction, in the human body, these principles are generated and derived.

In the mean time, ought that, which is in truth the defect of our chymistry, to hinder us from acquiescing in the inference, which a production of nature, by its place, its properties, its action, its surprising efficacy, its invaluable use, authorises us to draw in respect of creative design?

Another most subtile and curious function of animal bodies is secretion. This function is semi-chymical and semi-mechanical ; exceedingly important and diversified in its effects, but obscure in its process and in its apparatus. The importance of the secretory organs is but too well attested by the diseases, which an excessive, a deficient, or a vitiated secretion is almost sure of producing. A single secretion being wrong, is enough to make life miserable, or sometimes to destroy it. Nor is the variety less than the importance. From one and the same blood (I speak of the human body about twenty different fluids are separated; in their sensible properties, in taste, smell, colour, and consistency, the most unlike one another that is possible; thick, thin, salt, bitter, sweet : and, if from our own we pass to other species of animals, we find amongst their secretions not only the most various, but the most opposite properties; the most nutritious aliment, the deadliest

poison; the sweetest perfumes, the most fætid odours. Of these the greater part, as the gastric juice, the saliva, the bile, the slippery mucilage which lubricates the joints, the tears which moisten the eye, the wax which defends the ear, are, after they are secreted, made use of in the animal economy; are evidently subservient, and are actually contributing, to the utilities of the animal itself. Other Auids seem to be separated only to be rejected. That this also is necessary (though why it was originally necessary, we cannot tell), is shown by the consequence of the separation being long suspended; which consequence is disease and death. Akin to secretion, if not the same thing, is assimilation, by which one and the same blood is converted into bone, muscular flesh, nerves, membranes, tendons; things as different as the wood and iron, canvas and cordage, of which a ship with its furniture is composed. We have no operation of art wherewith exactly to compare all this, for no other reason perhaps than that all operations of art are exceeded by it. No chymical election, no chymical analysis or resolution of a substance into its constituent parts, no mechanical sifting or division, that we are acquainted with, in perfection or variety come up to animal secretion. Nevertheless, the apparatus and process are obscure; not to say absolutely concealed from our inquiries. In a few, and only a few instans ces, we can discern a little of the constitution of a gland

In the kidneys of large animals, we can trace the emulgent artery dividing itself into an infinite number of branches; their extremities every where communicating with little round bodies, in the substance of which bodies, the secret of the machinery seems to reside, for there the change is made. We can discern pipes laid from these round bodies towards

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

the pelvis, which is a basin within the solid of the
kidney. We can discern these pipes joining and
collecting together into larger pipes ; and, when so
collected, ending in innumerable papillæ, through
which the secreted fluid is continually oozing into its
receptacle. This is all we know of the mechanism of
a gland, even in the case in which it seems mosť
capable of being investigated. Yet to pronounce that
we know nothing of animal secretion, or nothing satis-
factorily, and with that concise remark to dismiss the
article from our argument, would be to dispose of the
subject very hastily and very irrationally. For the
purpose which we want, that of evincing intention, we
know a great deal. And what we know is this. We
see the blood carried by a pipe, conduit, or duct, to the
gland. We see an organised apparatus, be its con-
struction or action what it will, which we call that
gland. We see the blood, or part of the blood, after it
has passed through and undergone the action of the
gland, coming from it by an emulgent vein or artery,
i. e. by another pipe or conduit. And we see also at
the same time a new and specific fluid issuing from the
same gland by its excretory duct, i. e. by a third pipe
or conduit; which new fluid is in some cases dischar-
ged out of the body, in more cases retained within it,
and there executing some important and intelligent
office. Now supposing, or admitting, that we know
nothing of the proper internal constitution of a gland,
or of the mode of its acting upon the blood ; then our
situation is precisely like that of an unmechanical
looker-on, who stands by a stocking-loom, a corn-mill,
a carding machine, or a thrashing-machine, at work,
the fabric and mechanism of which, as well as all that
passes within, is hidden from his sight by the outside
case; or, if seen, would be too complicated for his

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
« VorigeDoorgaan »