LONDON, SATURDAY, JULY 2, 1910. CONTENTS. -No. 27. NOTES:-Tottel, Puttenham, and Turbervile, 1-Sir W. Jones and the Representation of Oxford University, 3 -T. L. Peacock on Fashionable Literature, 4-The National Flag, 5-Sir Thomas Cooke, Mayor of London -"Bullion"-Portable Railway-"Pepita," a Pattern -J. R. Smith: Dr. W. Saunders, 6. QUERIES:-George I.'s Statue at Hackwood-Garibaldi and his Flag-William Penn's Letters-Andronicus Lascaris-Donne's Poems, 7-Spexhall Church-Poem on Death of George II.-Cornelius de Witt-'Sir Edward Seaward's Narrative'-The Circle of Loda-Doge's Hat -The Duenna and Little Isaac'-Huguenot Church at Provins-Prince Eugene of Savoy-Commonwealth Grants of Arms, 8-Parish Registers 1837-Stones Early Village Life-Prior's Salford Church - Clergy retiring from the Dinner-Table-Heworth-Edw. Hatton -Sir Isaac's Walk-Episcopal Visitations-Chapel le Frith M. de Calonne's House in Piccadilly, 9-Prince Rupert-Goldsmith and Hackney, 10. REPLIES:-Bubb Dodington and his Circle, 10-'Rape of Proserpine' - London Children's Outdoor Games "Arabis"-"Teart"-Buff and Blue as Party Colours, 11 -Flax Bourton-Duncan Liddel and Jo. Potinius-Wall- Papers, 12-"Montjoy et St. Dennis"-"Worth" in Place-Names-"The Cock Tavern"-Kempesfeld, 13- "Onion"-Grey Family-Earthenware Tombstone, 14 "Literary Gossip," 15 - Strettell-Utterson - Colman's 'Man of the People'-Robin Hood's Men-"Broche"- Hampden and Ship Money, 16-Firegrate Folk-lore- The Ravensbourne-Door-knocker Etiquette, 17-Comets and Princes-Chevalier de Laurence - "Pull"-"The NOTES ON BOOKS:-'The Cornish Coast'-'Pride and Prejudice' Abridged-' A Collection of Eastern Stories' HAM'S 'ARTE OF ENGLISH POESIE,' I NOTICED some time ago, when searching for certain material in George Turbervile's 'Tragical Tales and other Poems, 1587, that the author often imitated the songs and sonnets in Tottel's 'Miscellany, and that occasionally his verse was almost identical with quotations from the 'Miscellany' which I had been able to identify in Putten- ham's 'Arte of English Poesie.' Then I called to mind the fact that the time of the composition of Puttenham's book is still a matter for intelligent speculation, and I compared the date of its publication, 1589, with that of Turbervile's 'Tragical Tales,' 1587. And I thought what a good thing it would be if I could find the latter quoted in Puttenham. But I was doomed to disappointment, for I could find no evidence At this time Mr. R. B. McKerrow very kindly lent me his copy of Turbervile's Epitaphes, Epigrams, Songs, and Sonnets,' 1567, and informed me that he had traced two quotations from it in Puttenham. To make a long story short, I determined to work through the book thoroughly, and I very soon learned that these Songs and Sonnets' shed much light on the mysterious 'Arte of English Poesie and on Turbervile's method of composition. Turbervile is the common rimer" who is most often censured by Puttenham, no fewer than ten passages Turbervile is mentioned only once by name And in her Majesties time that now is are sprong up an other crew of Courtly makers Noble Knowing that Turbervile was thus com- Now all this seems strange, because the with a quotation from Turbervile, and close some time after he wrote the words of com- mendation. Puttenham is a mysterious personage about whom we should like to know something more than the few bare details that have been ascertained up to the present; and therefore it is just possible that some day somebody may be able to point us to one or more replies to Puttenham by Turbervile's friends, or even to something by Turbervile himself, in work known to have been written subsequent to the production of 'The Arte of English Poesie. And then we may get to know more about the singularly able critic, but wretched poetaster, who wrote the latter work. The first two quotations I shall deal with are those which were pointed out to me by Mr. McKerrow. as one that said using this French word Roy, to make ryme with another verse, thus : O mightie Lord of love, dame Venus onely joy, Whose Princely power exceedes ech other heavenly roy. In neither case is Turbervile correctly quoted, and this circumstance seems to mark malice. Turbervile wrote: O Mightie lorde of love! Whose princely powre doth farre surmount 'The Lover to Cupid for Mercie,' &c. Collier's reprint, p. 80. The verse, says Puttenham, is good, but the term peevishly affected; and at p. 95 he says roy" was never yet received in our language for an English word. Now Puttenham's censure, after all, amounts to this only, that Turbervile wrenched a word to help his rime, and that he had no authority for using "roy." But I turn to that portion of 'The Mirror for The Lover refused lamenteth his Estate.' As very much of Turbervile's work in his 'Songs and Sonnets' is directly founded on poems in Tottel's 'Miscellany, I have no doubt he caught up his phrasing from Tottel in this case. But you never find Putten ham speaking slightingly of anything in Tottel, although he deals with twentyseven passages to be found in that book, some of which are quoted twice and even three times. Most of the quotations in Puttenham are from effusions of his own, which ungrateful and ill-discerning men have allowed, with the exception of one poor remnant, to be drowned in the black waters of oblivion. One hardly knows whether to weep or to laugh at these examples of his muse; and the suspicion often haunts one's mind that the terse, eloquent, and clear-headed prosewriter is making a May-game of his reader. These quotations come in strings; they are often contrasted with passages from the best writers; and occasionally the productions of poets like Surrey, Wyatt, and Sir Philip Sidney are alluded to merely to enable Puttenham to cite something of his own, which he makes you clearly understand is to be preferred to things that are to be found in the works of the persons named. And then he will deal with one of " your ordinary rimers" It is all done so pleasantly, and the assurance of the critic in the merit of his own verse is so superbly self-confident, that one feels compelled not only to accept with good-humoured toleration what he says, but also to forget his "side," and only remember his supreme ability as a teacher. Following one of these strings of his own verse, pp. 187-8, we come to Endiadis or the Figure of Twinnes, a manner speech which seems to make two phrases of one : "And as one of our ordinary rimers said. Of fortune nor her frowning face, I am nothing agast. In stead, of [fortunes frowning face.]" of The "ordinary rimer" is George Turbervile again, but why he should be dragged in thus needs explanation, because no fault is to be found in the manner of his speech that does not occur frequently in all writers of poetical compositions, who use the form, with more or less judgment, to give euphony to their verse. But some of Puttenham's readers would know who was aimed at, and it may be that in this case, as in others, the poet is purposely misquoted. Turbervile wrote: I will not be agast Of Fortune nor her frowning face. That Lovers ought to shunne no Paines to attaine their Love,' Collier, p. 237. CHARLES CRAWFORD. (To be continued.) SIR WILLIAM JONES AND THE REPRESENTATION OF OXFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARLIAMENT. IN 1780 Jones, who was not knighted until three years later, offered himself as a candidate for the representation of the University of Oxford in the House of Commons. But his Liberal opinions and his detestation of the American war and of the slave-trade were too frankly expressed to be agreeable to the electors, and he withdrew from the contest in order to avoid an overwhelming defeat. Sir Roger Newdigate, Bt., D.C.L., of University, of which College Jones was himself a Fellow, sat for Oxford from 31 January, 1750, until 1780, when he retired. The University was represented in 1780 by Sir William Dolben, Bt., D.C.L., sometime Student of Christ Church, and Francis Page, D.C.L. of New College. Sir William, great-grandson of John Dolben, Archbishop of York, represented Oxford during seven Parliaments, from 3 February, 1768, until 1806, when he retired. He always gave his steady support to Wilberforce's measures for the abolition of the slavetrade. Francis Bourne assumed the name of Page on inheriting the Oxfordshire estates of his great-uncle Sir Francis Page, the judge. He was junior member for Oxford from 23 March, 1768, until 1801. The following letter is not among those printed by Lord Teignmouth in his life of Sir William Jones (1806), vol. i. pp. 358-83: Lamb Building, Temple, 29 April, 1780. DEAR SIR, I beg you will accept a Latin Ode, lately written in imitation of Collins by a person who has a high respect for you, and who has disguised his name in the form of an anagram that of Julius Melesigonus. The writer is not ashamed to confess that this little poem contains his own political sentiments with some poetical amplification and colouring. Very few copies have been printed, to save the trouble of making many transcripts. I had fully intended to send you a copy of this ode, without giving you any further trouble; but I have just received a piece of news, which induces me to trouble you with one short question. Sir Roger Newdigate having declared his intention of vacating his seat for Oxford, the university will at the general election be called upon to chuse one of their members è gremio Academice to represent them, and, "to protect in the legislature the rights of the republick of letters," for which purpose, as Sir W. Blackstone observes, the franchise of sending members was first granted to our learned body. Now, the great attention and kindness, which you have shown me, Sir, tempt me to ask you, who are well able to inform me, whether the writer of the enclosed poem, if his friends were to declare him a candidate, would have any chance of respectable support from such members of the University, as would trust the defense of their rights, as scholars and as Englishmen, to a man who loves learning as zealously as he does rational constitutional Liberty. If the little personal influence that he has at Oxford, joined to his avowed affection for the genuine freedom of our English constitution, would make it improbable that he should be at all supported, it would be absurd in him to harbour a thought of making so fruitless an attempt; but if there were a prospect even of an honourable nomination, it would be an honour, which no other man or society of men could confer. I entreat you to excuse this liberty, and to believe me, with infinite respect, Sir, Your much obliged and ever faithful servant W. JONES. To Dr. Adams, Master of Pembroke Colledge. Johnson's friend Dr. William Adams was especially when we consider that the English are Master of Pembroke College and Canon of Gloucester from 1775 until his death in 1789. He was also for some time Archdeacon of Llandaff. The Ode to Liberty had been printed in the preceding March under the title of 'Julii Melesigoni ad Libertatem. The assumed name is formed by a transposition of the letters of Gulielmus Jonesius. A. R. BAYLEY. T. L. PEACOCK'S ESSAY ON THIS hitherto unpublished fragment, to of the British Museum. Admirers of Peacock will find his likes and dislikes portrayed in the same trenchant style that the novels display, and the explanation, perhaps, of difficulties which have arisen owing to suppression of names. The first part of it is as follows: "The fashionable metropolitan winter, which begins in spring and ends in autumn, is the season of happy reunion to those ornamental varieties of the human species who live to be amused for the benefit of the social order. It is the season of operas and exhibitions, of routs and concerts, of dinners at midnight and suppers at sunrise. It is the period of the general muster, the levy en masse of gentlemen in stays and ladies in short petticoats against their arch enemy Time. But these are the arms with which they assail the enemy in battalion: there are others with which in moments of morning solitude they are compelled to encounter him single-handed; and one of these weapons is the reading of light and easy books which command attention with out the labour of application, and amuse the idleness of fancy without disturbing the sleep of understanding. This species of literature which aims only to amuse and must be very careful not to instruct had never so many purveyors as at present: for there never was any state of society in which there were so many idle persons as there are at present in England, and it happens that these idle persons are, for the most part, so circumstanced that they can do nothing if they would, and, in the next place, that they are united in the links of a common interest which, being based in delusion, makes them even more averse than the well-dressed vulgar always are from the free exercise of reason and the bold investigation of truth "That the faculty of amusing should be the only passport of a literary work in the hands of general readers is not very surprising even, the most thinking people in the universe, but that the faculty of amusing should be as transient as the gloss on a new coat does seem at first view a little singular: for though all fashionable people read (gentlemen who have been at college excepted), yet as the soul of fashion is novelty, the books and the dress of the season go out of date which amused others twelve months ago would together, and to be amused year by that be to plead guilty to the heinous charge of having lived out of the world The stream of new books, therefore, floats over the parlour window and the drawing-room table to furnish a ready answer to the grunt of Mr. Donothing as to what Mrs. Dolittle and her daughters are reading, and having served this purpose, and that of putting the monster Time to a temporary death, flows peacefully on towards the port of Lethe. "The nature of this lighter literature and the of the last twenty years deserve consideration for changes which it has undergone with the fashions many reasons, and afford a subject of speculation which may be amusing and, I would add, instructive, were I not fearful of terrifying my readers in the outset. As every age has its own character, manners, and amusements, which "The newspaper of the day, the favourite magazine of the month, the tour, the novel, and the poem which are most recent in date and most fashionable in name, furnish forth the morning table of the literary dilettante. The springtide of metropolitan favour floats these intellectual deliciæ into every minor town and village in the kingdom, where they circle through their little day in the eddies of reading societies. "It may be questioned how far the favour of fashionable readers is a criterion of literary merit. It is certain that no work attracts any great share of general attention which does not possess considerable originality and great power to interest and amuse. But originality will sometimes attract notice for a little space, as Mr. Romeo Loates attracted some three or four audiences by the mere force of excessive absurdity; and the records of the Minerva Press will shew that a considerable number of readers can be both interested and amused by works completely expurgated of all the higher qualities of mind. And without dragging reluctant dullness back to-day, let us only consider the names of Monk Lewis and of Kotzebue they have sunk in a few years into comparative oblivion-and we shall see that the condition of a fashionable author differs very little in stability from that of a political demagogue. "Mr. Walter Scott seems an exception to this. Having long occupied the poetical throne, he seems indeed to have been deposed by Lord Byron, but he has risen with redoubled might as a novelist, and has thus continued from the publication of 'The Lay of the Last Minstrel' the most popular writer of his time-perhaps the most universally successful in his own day of any writer that ever lived. He has the rare talent |