Chap. ix. That the Record of the Articles in the See of

Canterbury was not subscrib'd, nor had the broad Seal

affixed to it.

Page 218

Chap. x. Of the Queen's Approbation of the Articles. 219

Chap. xi. That the Articles were passed, recorded, and

ratified in 1562, in Latin only.

Chap. xii, Of the Differences between the Bennet College

MS. and Wolf's Edition ; and of the Correčtions and

Observations in Bod. 2.

Chap. xiii. That Bod. 2. does probably express the Record

of the Articles in the Registry of the See of Canterbury.

Chap. xiv. The Differences between the Bennet College

Latin MS. and Wolf's Edition, particularly with

respect to the Controverted Clause of the Twentieth Ar-

ticle, and the whole Twenty ninth Article, accounted



Chap. xv. Of the Postscript of Wolf's Edition.


Chap. xvi. Of the first English Editions of the Articles.

Chap. xvii. Whether any Edition of the Articles was pub-

- lish'd before March 25. 1563.


Chap. xviji. Some Påffages relating to the Articles in the

7 Tear 1566.


Chap. xix. Proceedings of the Convocation in 1571. re
lating to the Articles.


Chap. xx. Of that Copy of Wolf's Edition of the Artis

cles, which was subscribed by the lower House of Convo-

cation in 1571, and is now lodg’d in the Bodleyan

Library, and which I have called Bod. 1.

Chap. xxi. The Differences between the Latin and En-

glish Editions printed before, and in, the Year 1571;
and the Agreements or Disagreements of the Bennet

College English MS. of the same Year, with the respe-
Etive English Editions.



Chap. xxxiv. An Obje£tion from fome Passages of Archia

bishop Laud, Mr. Chillingworth, Archbishop Bram-

hall, and. Bishop Stillingfleet, answered. 424,

Chap. xxxv. What Liberty the Church allows to the Sub-

scribers of the Articles.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The Errata of the Collation are printed at the

End of the Book.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]



Shall prepare the way for my intended Ejay, by exhibiting a Collation of all the ancient Copies of the Articles, both Printed and Manufcript. Now there are two MS. Copies of the Articles, the one in Latin, the other in English, which were both given, with a vast Quantity of

other MSS. to Corpus Cbristi (commonly callid Bennet) College in Cambridge, by Archbishop Parker. The Latin Copy was figned Jan. 29. 1962. and the English Copy was figned May 11. 1571. Each of these Copies is denoted in the following Collation by the Letters MS. But the Distinction is apparent notwithstanding. For when the Reference belongs to the Latin Text, the Letters MS. betoken the Latin Copy ; but when the Reference belongs to the English Text, those Letters betoken the English one.

The Printed Copies are numerous. They are partly Latin, and partly English.

One Latin Copy is printed in O&avo by Reginald Wolf. It contains 36 Pages (reckoning the Title, and the Blank on the back side' of it, for two) but the Pages are not numbred. It bears Date 1563. In the Title Page there is a Fruit Tree describ'd in a sort of a Target, under which are two Boys; the One seems climbing, the other gathers the Fruit fallen to the Ground ; and between the Limbs of the Tree there is a Label with Charitas in it. The Articles are printed in Roman, but the Titles in



[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
« VorigeDoorgaan »