Spheres Of Justice
Explains how diverse societies distribute such entities as education, citizenship, work, leisure time, honors, and love, as well as wealth and power, and argues that a just distribution necessitates an open egalitarianism
Resultaten 1-3 van 49
Even if we choose pluralism , as I shall do , that choice still requires a coherent defense . There must be principles that justify the choice and set limits to it , for pluralism does not require us to endorse every proposed ...
Their right to choose derives from the existence in this particular territory of a community of citizens ; and it is not compatible with the destruction of the community or its transformation into yet another local tyranny . here is ...
The hospital selection committee need not choose the applicant with the highest score ; it looks not only back to his exams but forward to performances not yet performed .
Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven
LibraryThing ReviewGebruikersrecensie - aitastaes - LibraryThing
Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice (1971). Volledige review lezen
LibraryThing ReviewGebruikersrecensie - DromJohn - LibraryThing
Real world philosophy rather than the ivory tower justice of Rawls, Walzer separates the world into spheres where justice is distributed differently in each sphere, with many real world examples ... Volledige review lezen
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Spheres Of Justice: A Defense Of Pluralism And Equality
Geen voorbeeld beschikbaar - 1984