Spheres Of Justice
Explains how diverse societies distribute such entities as education, citizenship, work, leisure time, honors, and love, as well as wealth and power, and argues that a just distribution necessitates an open egalitarianism
Resultaten 1-3 van 86
But that would be very expensive , and so we settle for something less . How much less can only be decided politically . * One can imagine the sorts of things that would figure in the debates . Above all , I think , there would be a ...
But this wealth doesn't simply belong to the individual ( and still less to his circle of friends ) ; he is its legal owner only under certain descriptions and for certain purposes . Under other descriptions and for other purposes ...
Certainly , plutocracy is less frightening than totalitarianism ; resistance is less dangerous . The chief reason for the difference is that money can buy power and influence , as it can buy office , education , honor , and so on ...
Wat mensen zeggen - Een review schrijven
LibraryThing ReviewGebruikersrecensie - aitastaes - LibraryThing
Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice (1971). Volledige review lezen
LibraryThing ReviewGebruikersrecensie - DromJohn - LibraryThing
Real world philosophy rather than the ivory tower justice of Rawls, Walzer separates the world into spheres where justice is distributed differently in each sphere, with many real world examples ... Volledige review lezen
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Spheres Of Justice: A Defense Of Pluralism And Equality
Geen voorbeeld beschikbaar - 1984