Judgments of the Privy Council on Appeals from India, Volume 2Thacker, Spink, 1878 |
Overige edities - Alles bekijken
Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen
Act VIII adoption advise Her Majesty affirmed alleged amount annas appeal appellant applied Bahadoor Bengal brother Calcutta champerty Chunder Chundun claim Collier Colvile costs daughter Dayabhaga death decision declared decree deed defendant dismissed dispute document Doorga Doyne effect entitled evidence execution fact father favor Government granted ground heirs held High Court Hindoo family Hindoo law humbly advise husband India interest issue joint family judgment Judicial Commissioner jurisdiction Lall land Leith Lordships think Madras Maharajah mesne profits Mitacshara Mohun mokurruree mortgage Mouzah Nagarattars Narain objection opinion Oudh parties Pershad person petition plaint plaintiff possession pottah Principal Sudder Ameen Privy Council proceedings proprietor purchaser question Rajah recover referred registered remand rent res judicata respondent revenue share Singh Sir Barnes Peacock Sir James Sir James W Sir Montague Sir Robert Subordinate Judge summary settlement sunnud taken talook talookdar taluqdar villages widow zemindar Zillah
Populaire passages
Pagina 98 - ... the plaintiff must recover, if, at all, upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of that of the defendant.
Pagina 395 - We may now take for granted that the dealings with these companies are not like dealings with other partnerships, and that the parties dealing with them are bound to read the statute and the deed of settlement. But they are not bound to do more. And the party here, on reading the deed of settlement would find, not a prohibition from borrowing, but a permission to do so on certain conditions. Finding that the authority might be made complete by a resolution, he would have a right to infer the fact...
Pagina 109 - No action or proceeding shall be open to objection on the ground that a merely declaratory judgment or order is sought thereby, and the court may make binding declarations of right whether any consequential relief is or could be claimed or not.
Pagina 212 - No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title...
Pagina 39 - On the other hand, if the defendants, not stopping at the natural use of their close, had desired to use it for any purpose which I may term a non-natural use, for the purpose of introducing into the close that which in its natural condition was not in or upon it...
Pagina 292 - The facts of the case are fully stated in the judgment of the Judicial Committee as well as the order of the High Court appealed from.
Pagina 189 - ... (c) any other questions arising between the parties to the suit in which the decree was passed, or their representatives, and relating to the execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree, or to the stay of execution thereof. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to bar a separate suit for mesne profits accruing between the institution of the first suit and the execution of the decree...
Pagina 105 - The actual pressure on the estate, the danger to be averted, or the benefit to be conferred upon it in the particular instance, is the thing to be regarded.
Pagina 39 - The defendants, treating them as the owners or occupiers of the close on which the reservoir was constructed, might lawfully have used that close for any purpose for which it might in the ordinary course of the enjoyment of land be used ; and if, in what I may term the natural user of that land, there had been any accumulation of water either on the surface or underground, and if by the operation of the laws of nature that accumulation of water had passed off into the close occupied by the plaintiff,...
Pagina 377 - It can only be exercised rightly in a case of need or for the benefit of the estate. But where, in the particular instance, the charge is one that a prudent owner would make in order to benefit the estate, the bnn&fide lender is not affected by the precedent mismanagement of the estate.