Spinoza and the Case for Philosophy

Voorkant
Cambridge University Press, 8 dec 2014
This book analyzes three often-debated questions of Spinoza's legacy: was Spinoza a religious thinker? How should we understand Spinoza's mind-body doctrine? What meaning can be given to Spinoza's notions - such as salvation, beatitude, and freedom - which are seemingly incompatible with his determinism, his secularism, and his critique of religion. Through a close reading of often-overlooked sections from Spinoza's Ethics, Elhanan Yakira argues that these seemingly conflicting elements are indeed compatible, despite Spinoza's iconoclastic meanings. Yakira argues that Ethics is an attempt at providing a purely philosophical - as opposed to theological - foundation for the theory of value and normativity.
 

Geselecteerde pagina's

Inhoudsopgave

Preface
Acknowledgments
The Exegetic Inadequacy
The Context
Remark on Spinoza and the Averroist
Ethics IIPropositions 113 4 1 The Centrality of Propositions 11 and 13
A Few General Remarks
Part IV
Adequacy Truth Knowledge
Man a Mode ofthe Substance

Overige edities - Alles bekijken

Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen

Over de auteur (2014)

Elhanan Yakira is Schulman Professor of Philosophy at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He has previously taught at the Sorbonne, cole Normale Suprieure in Paris, cole des Hautes tudes en Sciences Sociales, Pennsylvania State University and Indiana University. Yakira's previous publications include Ncessit, Contrainte et Choix: la mtaphysique de la libert chez Spinoza et Leibniz (1989), winner of the 1990 Charles Lambert Prize from Acadmie des Sciences Morales et Politiques, Institut de France; La causalit de Galile Kant (1994); Leibniz's Theory of the Rational (with Emily Grosholz, 1998); and Post-Zionism, Post-Holocaust (Cambridge, 2010).

Bibliografische gegevens