Pagina-afbeeldingen
PDF
ePub

as a family of this name was connected with that of Heath, in which I am also interested, I am able to supply him with sources of information which perhaps may afford some clues to his quest. My notes refer me to Harl. Soc. Pubs. 'Worc.,' vol. xx. 7; Vistn. of Staffs, 1614 and 1663-4,' by the W. Salt Soc., No. 70 (compiled by Thos. Phillips); Misc. Genealogica et Herald., series ii. 3, 104; Com. Leices.,' by Nichols, vol. iv. p. 370; Harl. MS. 1995, fol. 62. This last records a marriage between Heath and Caldwall (? Caldwell), and is the one reference which I have personally seen. My notes also mention that a Robt. Caldwell resided at Rolston, Staffs, and William Caldwall at Burton-on-one scutshion quarterly, to witt the first quarter Trent.

[ocr errors]

The following notes may perhaps be helpful to C. T. E.:—

He

1. Thomas Coldwell, M.A., was instituted to the rectory and parish church of Newbury in 1592 by John Coldwell, Bishop of Sarum, on presentation of Queen Elizabeth. seems to have held the living of Shaw-cumDonnington jointly with that of Newbury, and was probably a kinsman of the Bishop of Sarum (cf. Reg. Coldwell, f. 3).

2. Thomas Coldwell was collated Sub-Dean of Salisbury as successor of Richard Hooker, 16 Feb., 1594/5 (cf. Le Neve's Fast. Eccl. Angl.,' vol. ii. p. 621).

I found this information in a newspaper cutting from article viii. on the church of St. Nicholas, Newbury, by Walter Money, F.S.A. No date appears on the cutting, nor any indication of the name of the paper. The following excerpt is from Camden's 'Britannia,' under Richmondshire :—

into two roads. That towards the North lies by From Catarractonium the military way falls Caldwell and by Aldburgh."

66

J. W. B.

[ocr errors]

Respecting the coat of arms, the earliest Muir whom historians of Scotland start with is a Sir J. Gilchrist. He married the only daughter of Sir William Cumming, of Rowallan. "The History of the House of Rowallane. by Sir William Mure, Knight, of Rowallan, written in, or prior to, 1657," informs us "Sr. Gilchrist' bore from his ancestors "Argent, a fesse azure charged wt thrie starrs proper." Quartering" was not then known in Scotland, and Sir Adam (first of the name) was the first "who quartered wt his owne the armes of the Cuming," &c. "So yt to this day the Airs & successors of the persons above mentioned do beare two Coats in Argent, a fesse parting equallie the field, Azure house of Caldwell......do bear the arms of the charged wt thrie starrs......Thence it is that the Paternall Coat," &c.

ALFRED CHAS. JONAS. Sarah Nevill, afterwards Burkitt, was sister CROMWELL FLEETWOOD (10th S. iii. 466).— of John Nevill, called the elder in the will. Chauncy speaks of their father as John the elder, and calls this John, the younger. He was in possession in Chauncy's time, and regarded by him as the heir. The George who married Jane Guyon was his son; the will quoted shows that John was only in possession as guardian for his son, and prebenefit. The younger son John was doubtsumably obtained power to sell it for his less the John Nevill of Ridgewell, barbersurgeon, who in 1710 took out a licence to marry Judith Ovington.

This Ridgewell pedigree seems to rest on Harl. MS. 3882, which is a large collection insert a Thomas as son of Sir Thomas, son relating to Nevill families, and has various trial pedigrees of this branch; most of these of Lord Latimer, but without any details whatever.

The family of Caldwell had an existence in Scotland centuries before the repeal of the Edict of Nantes. Sir Adam Muir, of a Rowallan (grandson of Sir Archd. Muir, who died in 1349), had three brothers: one of them, Robert of Comeeskin, married the heiress of Caldwell in 1349. I would not venture to assert what was the origin of the place-name. "Cold," "kald," "cauld," &c., are numerous in Scottish place-names. It would not surprise me if it had its origin in "Coiladar"-.e., the wood of oaks. Caldwell is in the parish of Dunlop, Ayrshire. The old castle of Caldwell stood on the top of a hillside, to the south-west of Lochlibb (now known as Lugton), in Renfrewshire. One square tower of the castle was standing in 1876.

On the first page of the same collection is small slip pasted in :

[ocr errors]

Nevill......of Halsted and Redgewell in Essex a time of King Richard the first see my book of pedigree from Hugh Nevill cheif Forester in the Pedigrees Miscellaneous Derb Nott Hunt S... Salop and other countys to George Nevill of Staple Inne fo. 260.”

This was the George who purchased Berkhampstead.

The other notes seem to be by Le Neve, and I have long been anxious to trace the book referred to above. If correct, it entirely disposes of the alleged descent of the Ridgewell family from the Latimers. The lion seal of Hugh the Forester in the British Museum was obtained from John of Ridgewell attached to an Essex deed; in MS. 3882 is the impres

sion of a small newly cut seal of the lion rampant, guttee de sang, with a lion crest and the address of a posting house at Ridgewell. This is the coat stated by Clutterbuck to be shown on the tomb of George Nevill. Morant also, s.v. Wethersfield, says that John Nevill of Ridgewell was of the kin of Hugh the Forester.

Morant's fuller account of these Nevills is very incorrect; it was apparently copied from the rough notes in the Harl. MS. Sir Thomas died in 1582, not in 1540, and the Thomas who died in 1602, said to be his son, was of another family. There is strong reason to doubt if the son Thomas, who was nine in 1546 at the time of the I.P.M. on his mother Maria Tey, ever attained his majority. It will be better, however, to start another note on that subject.

There was a Fleetwood Nevill, clerk, of County Hunts, who was twenty-five when he took out a marriage licence in 1690. Foster's 'Al. Oxon.' has an entry of his son Fleetwood and further particulars. He was possibly related to Isabel, daughter of Hercy Nevill, of Grove; she married Sir Gerard Fleetwood as her third husband.

The Harl. MS. and other accounts of the Ridgewell family are wrong in other ways; the uncles of John did not die without issue male, and so clear the way for John as head of the family, and therefore heir male of the house of Nevill, according to this later pretension.

I have many particulars of these and numerous other Nevill branches in Essex, taken from the Essex wills; all of these under the name of Nevill I have abstracted down to about 1650. I shall be glad to correspond with any one interested.

It seems evident that George of Berkhampstead claimed descent from Hugh of the Lion, and not from the Latimers. It is just possible that at a rather later date the identity of George's great-grandfather with a son of Sir Thomas (perhaps by a second wife) was discovered, and the other pedigree abandoned. RALPH NEVILL, F.S.A.

Castlehill, Guildford.

Since Cussans wrote, a "restoration" of the church of St. Andrew, Little Berkhampstead, has taken place; even this ordeal hardly explains the error in date, which appears to be due to a slip on the part either of the historian or his printer. On the south side of the sanctuary floor is a large slab, from which, in September, 1904, I copied the following inscription (the lettering is well preserved) :

[blocks in formation]

"THE MISSAL' (10th S. iii. 469; iv. 34).— MR. PEACOCK is doubtless quite right in thinking that Sir Walter Scott calls any service-book a missal. I cannot give a precise reference, but I can quote a parallel case. In The Antiquary' (fifth edition, 1818, ii. 267-70) he describes a burial: "A priest, dressed in his cope and stole......recited from the breviary......those solemn words which the ritual of the Catholic Church has consecrated to the rendering of dust to dust

.A loud Alleluia......closed the ceremony."

[ocr errors]

had

W. C. B.

the

NORDEN'S 'SPECULUM BRITANNIE' (10th S. iii. 450; iv. 12).—I cannot find that Lowndes gives 1596 as the date of an edition of this book. Lowndes gives the date 1596 (in parentheses) to Norden's 'Preparatiue' to his Speculum Britanniæ,' but this was a ghost book that never a separate existence. The Middlesex part of Speculum' was first published in 1593, and the Hertfordshire part in 1598. In 1637 a second edition of both parts was published, and in 1723 a third edition, which is that To this described by MR. W. J. GADSDEN. last edition was prefixed Norden's 'Preparatiue to his Speculum Britanniæ,' the principal part of which is the address "To all address is dated 4 November, 1596, Lowndes Covrteovs Gentlemen," &c.; and as this gave that date to the 'Preparatiue,' of which no separate copies are known to be in

existence. The editor of the 1723 reissue

probably printed it from a manuscript, which is most likely no longer in existence, and the maps, &c., look as if they had been printed from the original coppers. From the description given by MR. GADSDEN, it would appear that his copy does not contain the engraved and printed general title-pages. The arrangement of the book, however, varies in different copies. In Lowndes's collation the leaf headed "To the right worshipful M. William Warde Esquire," is placed at the beginning of the book, whereas in my copy it is placed at the end of the Middlesex portion, before the leaf of Nicolson's commendatory verses, and a glance will show that this is obviously

Sandgate.

She died R. J. FYNMORE.

the right position. Whether at the beginning Two years after her marriage Mrs. Radcliffe made or end, these two leaves should be placed 7th February, 1822, at her house in London." her first appearance as a novelist. together, the French verses of Nicolson facing his English ones. For an interesting account of Norden's various works in print and manuscript MR. MARCHAM should consult Sir Henry Ellis's valuable introduction to his edition of The Description of Essex,' issued by the Camden Society in 1840. W. F. PRIDEAUX.

In the bibliography of John Norden's works attached to the reprint of the 1598 edition of Norden's Description of Hartfordshire,' the following are recorded:

1593. Speculum Britanniæ. The firste parte; An historicall and chorographicall Description of Middlesex. Wherein are......sett down the names of the cyties......parishes, etc. The title-page is engraved, three folding plates, pp. 50. London, 1593. 4to.

1596. Norden's Preparative to his Speculum Britanniæ. Intended as reconciliation of sundrie propositions by divers persons tendred, concerning the same.-London, 1596. 8vo.

1598. Speculi Britanniæ Pars. The Description of Hartfordshire. With engraved title-page and map.-London, 1598. 4to.

I may, perhaps, mention that although the Middlesex and Hertfordshire volumes are usually found together they were issued separately. Both were reprinted in one volume in 1723, but the edition of 1637 mentioned by Lowndes has apparently no existence. W. B. GERISH.

Bishop's Stortford.

ANN RADCLIFFE (10th S. iv. 9).—In 'Novels and Novelists from Elizabeth to Victoria,' by J. Cordy Jeaffreson, 1858, vol. ii. p. 1, may be found the following:

"Although Ann Radcliffe's parents were in rank no higher than respectable tradespeople, she was more than decently descended. Her paternal grandmother was a sister of Cheselden, the distinguished surgeon; her maternal grandmother was Anne Oates, a sister of Dr. Samuel Jebb, of Stratford, who was father of Sir Richard Jebb; and she was lineally descended from a De Witt, a near relative of John and Cornelius, who came over from Holland to carry out a Government plan to drain the fens of Lincolnshire, a design which the popular rising and the execution of Charles I. expelled from the minds of its projectors. maiden name was Ward, and she was born in London on the 9th of July, 1764. When she was only three-and-twenty the lovely creature gave her heart and hand to a Mr. William Radcliffe. This fortunate gentleman was a graduate of Oxford, a law student, and a man of considerable literary abilities. Upon his marriage, deeming it prudent to exercise his talents in some way that should reward his exertions with immediate payment, he relinquished his legal pursuits, and, devoting his time and powers to journalism, eventually became the proprietor and editor of The English Chronicle.

Her

It has been stated by a former correspondent of N. & Q.' that this lady was a native of Durham, and the daughter of one of the vicars choral. She was for some years organist of St. Mary-le-Bow, Durham; she a very pretty poetess, and used to Mirror, &c. She has been confounded with publish in The Durham Advertiser, Monthly Mrs. Radcliffe, not merely on the Continent, but even in England.

was

EVERARD HOME COLEMAN.

71, Brecknock Road.

The ring in question cannot have belonged to the eminent novelist, who was born only three years before the death of the person whose memory was cherished in the inscription. Ann Radcliffe, whose maiden name was Ward, was born in 1764, and married to William Radcliffe about 1787. She died in 1823. J. HOLDEN MACMICHAEL.

[The 'D.N.B.' states that the novelist died 7 February, 1823. MR. A. R. BAYLEY is also thanked for reply.]

ROWSE OR ROUS OF CRANSFORD, WEST SUFFOLK (10th S. iii. 270).—E. S. R. might gain some information regarding the Suffolk Rouses by referring to Savage's 'New England Genealogical Dictionary.' Many families came from Suffolk and Essex to New England.

Can he inform me who were the following Rouses mentioned in the will of Edward Peters, 1638, of Bristol? He was a merchant, and desires to be buried at St. Nicholas's Church, Bristol. Among others he names brother George Peters (he was a minister, graduate of Oxford), sister Rouse, aunt Alice Gleason, mother-in-law Ann Grey, cousin Ann Morgan, wife Margaret, children Edward, George, Ann, Elizabeth, and Grace Peters. This Edward Peters was son of George Petre or Peter and his wife Grace (daughter of John Pyle, of Exeter). The Peters were of Devon. G. A. T.

Albany, N.Y.

SCOTCH BURIAL CUSTOM (10th S. iv. 10).— Had the occurrence at the burying ground of Longforgan, Dundee, been of an ordinary character, it would not have been chronicled in the newspapers. It is unusual in Scotland for women in any circumstances to attend a funeral, though the custom is less stringently adhered to than was the case twenty years ago. In the Highlands people cling to old habits more tenaciously than in the south of

JUL 25 1906

Scotland, and this is especially the case with respect to the rites of sepulture. It has long been, and still is, the custom in the north for the nearest male relative to stand at the head of the grave and hold the cord next to him by which the coffin is lowered. This is the place of a husband in laying the remains of his wife in the grave, of a father burying his son, and of the eldest son attending the funeral of his father. A near relative takes his place at the foot of the grave, and kinsmen and friends stand at each side and assist in lowering the coffin. J. GRIGOR.

The custom in Scotland of the chief mourner holding the principal cord in the lowering of the coffin is alluded to in 'Poems' by the Rev. John Black, of Butley, in Suffolk. 1799, p. 10, in "An Elegy on the Author's Mother, who was buried in the churchyard of Dunichen, in Scotland," which contains the stanza :Oh, how my soul was griev'd when I let fall The string that dropt her silent in the grave! Yet thought I then I heard her spirit call: "Safe I have pass'd through death's o'erwhelming

wave.

[ocr errors]

See Brand's Popular Antiquities,' revised by Sir Henry Ellis (Bohn, 1854), vol. ii. p. 274.

J. HOLDEN MACMICHAEL.

I believe it to be the custom throughout Scotland for the chief mourner to lower the head of the coffin into the grave, the second the foot, and those further in degree the sides, the position of each mourner being indicated to him on a card sent before the funeral by the undertaker.

R. BARCLAY-ALLARDICE.

Lostwithiel, Cornwall.

PINCHBECK FAMILY (10th S. iii. 421 ; iv. 33). -The doggerel lines quoted by MR. W. H. PINCHBECK were, when I was at school in Somersetshire, fifty years ago, well known as a schoolboys' catch for the innocent new boy and for our unwary sisters; and they were also familiar to a younger generation seven years ago at St. Albans Grammar School but in each of these cases the first line read as follows::

Adam and Eve and Pinch me, and the object of the ditty can be clearly diagnosed from this reading of the first line, coupled with the obviously necessary reply to the question asked in the fourth line. The substitution of the surname "Pinchbeck " for "Pinch me" in the first line would seem to destroy the whole point of the catch.

F. DE H. L.

I venture to think that the surname was originally derived from Pinchbeck, near Spalding, Lincolnshire, rather than the nick

name of somebody remarkable for having a pincer-like mouth or nose, as has been ingeniously surmised. Domesday Book, in one instance, registers the place as Picebech. ST. SWITHIN.

The first line of the doggerel quoted is, in Devonshire, always given "Adam and Eve and Pinch me," while the remaining lines are as you print them. And the Devon version appears to me to be the correct one, inasmuch tionee the obvious answer, "Pinch me,” never as the questioner, on getting from the quesfails to administer a pinch.

Teignmouth.

FRED. C. FROST, F.S.I.

S. iii. 387, 435; iv. 36).-There is always a HOLLICKE OR HOLLECK, CO. MIDDLESEX (10th risk of confusion when we find contemporaries bearing the same or similar names. We find from the I.P.M. of Philip Basset, 6 November, 56 Hen. III., that the deceased held Elsefeld manor in Oxfordshire, in exchange for a manor of Walter de Morton called "Ledred in Soserey" (Leatherhead, in Surrey). This shows that a certain Walter de Morton existed temp. Henry III., but for the reasons given in my former reply, I think that the owner of Haliwick manor was Walter de Horton. There are, of course, several places from which he might have derived his surHorton in Bucks, opposite Stanwell on the name, the nearest to "Little Bernete" being other side of the river Colne.

Norden says that Muswell Hill was also called Pinsenall Hill, and a variant of this word is Pensnothyll. The first syllable of the word reminds us of Penshurst and Penshanger, and would seem to point to a wooded hill. I would, therefore, tentatively suggest that the constituents of the name are the A.-S. pīn, a pine, hnut, a nut, and hyll, a hill, the complete word signifying Pine Nut (or Pine Cone) Hill. W. F. PRIDEAUX.

The oldest form of this place-name appears to be "Halewik " (cf. the Hale, Tottenham)— generally a piece of flowing water, and very A. H.

common.

JOSIAS CATZIUS (10th S. iv. 10).-It is more than probable that he is a fictitious character, and "the gathering together of the Jews in great bodies under" him did not take place at all. There is a copy of the 'Doomesday' in the British Museum among the pamphlets collected by George III. The press-mark is E. 383 (23). It is a short tract of six small quarto pages, one and a half of which are blank and one is occupied by the title. The purpose of the gathering of the

Jews ("in Illyria, Bithinia, and Cappadocia ") is stated to have been the conquest of the Holy Land "out of the hand of Ottaman." The anonymous author had "certaine and credible information" about it, and refers also to "letters from beyond the seas." The patronymic "Catzius" is Dutch, but Van der Aa's Dutch dictionary of biography does not seem to mention him. L. L. K.

COKE OR COOK? (10th S. iii. 430 ; iv. 13.)— There is no difficulty in this matter to any one who is acquainted with the regular historical development of English sounds. At p. 48 of my 'Primer of English Etymology I show that every A.-S. ō (long o, as in note) normally becomes oo (as in boot) in modern English. Among the instances I cite do, I do; col, cool; rod, rood; fōda, food, &c. I then note that this oo (as in cool) is shortened before a final k, formerly written c, as in hōc, a hook; hrōc, a rook; scōc, shook; cōc, cook; bōc, book. It may further be noted that Norman scribes, in the fourteenth century, whilst the word was still pronounced coke, and before the change of ō to u had set in, frequently used the spelling coke instead of the more correct cook, especially in the genitive case. Thus the Ellesmere MS. of Chaucer has 'The prologe of the Cokes Tale,' immediately succeeded by The Cook of London,' as in three other MSS. But the Petworth and Lansdowne MSS. have 'The Coke of London,' for they exhibit later spellings.

[ocr errors]

There was no difficulty as long as cook and coke were both pronounced like mod. E. coke. But when the regular lowering (not "hardening") of guttural vowels set in, the trouble began, and coke became ambiguous. Archaically, it represented the sound coke, but practically people came to sound it as mod. E. cook. The sound changed so gradually that at first it was hardly noticed; but there came a time when no one could be sure about it. All therefore that we know about Coke for certain is that it really means "Cook"; but as to the pronunciation, all depends upon chronology. No doubt the appearance of the word has largely influenced the sound; and many moderns would pronounce coke as coak without the slightest hesitation.

The history of Cuckfield is similar: the old Coc-feld, Anglo- French Cokefeld, regularly became Cook-field; but in this instance the influence of the following kf further shortened the oo (as in cook) to the oo in blood.

All such changes present no difficulty to the student of phonetics; but most English

men have resolutely determined that this is the last_subject which they would willingly learn. It is certainly the one which they least understand. WALTER W. SKEAT.

The 'Life of Sir Edward Coke,' by Cuthbert W. Johnson, is a work of no authority, according to an amusing article of thirteen columns in the Gent. Mag., November, 1837, p. 502, which points out the grossest blunders. RALPH THOMAS.

We are promised an authoritative account of THE OXFORD RAMBLE' (10th S. iv. 43).— this Alderbury Churchyard broadside ballad, which is mentioned in Roxburghe Ballads,' vol. viii. p. 181, an exemplar being in Roxb. Coll., iii. 490, and an important book-form copy, dated 1744, and holding two extra stanzas, in possession of Mr. J. W. Ebsworth. The account will describe his own three A. N. Q. exemplars and three others.

Miscellaneous.

NOTES ON BOOKS, &c. Diary and Letters of Madame D'Arblay, 1778-1840. With Preface and Notes by Austin Dobson.. Vol. VI. (Macmillan & Co.)

MR. DOBSON's self-imposed and admirably executed is now in the hands of his subscribers and readers. task is accomplished, and his concluding volume Itis, in some respects, the best of the series. If it is a little less fresh and winsome than the earlier volumes, it is written in a more sober period and deals with more serious matters. The change of which we are conscious is that from adolescence into middle, and, at the close, elderly life. The girl has ripened into the matron, and the difference between the earlier and the later records corre-sponds precisely to that between youth and age. Men of ripe years are generally tender and hood, and the joyous aspirations and anticipations caressing in their feeling towards youth and girlwhich attend the dawn of life move most those who know best how quickly the radiance will fade. Each stage of the work has, however, its own attractions, and we may almost say, in rising from. the consideration of the last, in Donne's gracious words, as we recall them :

Nor spring nor summer beauty has the grace That I have seen in an autumnal face. The volume opens and the work virtually closes. with a postscript, which consists naturally, to a certain extent, of afterthoughts, and is, in part,. an apologia. Comments upon previous volumes are answered, and a defence of the heroine is undertaken against such gently questioning remarks as have been provoked. We fancy though this is perhaps a piece of self-delusion

that we trace special response to observations of our own. No very serious complaining had Mr. Dobson to face, and his defence-if such it may be called when there is no attack-may be easily accepted, while Macaulay's vindication, which is selected as the epigraph for the volumes, is exactly just: "If she recorded with minute.

« VorigeDoorgaan »