 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 pagina’s
...favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public. The rule,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 850 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever... | |
 | Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - 520 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." That refers to the case of 1837. 1837. a party, having no interest in a trade, taking a bond from another... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In... | |
 | 1839 - 474 pagina’s
...coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 pagina’s
...favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 730 pagina’s
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 726 pagina’s
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either; it can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now,... | |
| |
... whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection... 
