The Mitigation Symposium: A National Workshop on Mitigating Losses of Fish and Wildlife Habitats, July 16-20, 1979, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Voorkant
Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1979 - 684 pagina's
 

Inhoudsopgave

Mitigation of Transportation Impacts
71
Mitigation in Our Future
78
The Role of the Water Resources Council
86
An Evaluation of the Ecological Basis of Mitigation Requirements in
93
Mitigation in the Oregon Coastal Management Program
103
Mitigating Oil Spill DamageEcologically Responsible Cleanup Techniques
121
Estuarine Habitat Mitigation Planning in the Southeast
129
Coastal Habitat Mitigation in Tampa Bay Florida
136
Mitigation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Losses in Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands
152
Values and Protection of Riparian Ecosystems
164
Wildlife Benefits Through Construction and Management of Floodwater
181
Principles and Standards Planning Chikaskia River Basin Kansas with
203
A CrossImpact Assessment for Fish and Wildlife Habitats
209
The Inertia and Resiliency of a Mountain Stream
211
The Role of Mitigation in WaterResource Development Projects That Benefit
215
19
218
Mitigation and the Forest Industry
229
33
230
Biotic Recovery of a Reclaimed River Channel After Coal Strip Mining
239
36
251
Mitigation and Research Needs for Wildlife on Western Surface Mined Lands
252
44
261
Wildlife Mitigative Measures for Oil and Gas Activity in Alberta
264
BenefitCost Analysis as a Basis for Compensation and Mitigation Decisions
276
Dust Abatement Project with Wildlife Enhancement on Canyon Ferry
282
49
287
Strategies for MidColumbia Fish Production
289
Potential Use of Hydroelectric Facilities for Manipulating
296
54
304
Predicting Impacts of a Proposed Irrigation Water Conservation Project
305
Restoration of Wildlife Habitat to Offset Project Losses Garrison Diversion Unit
318
Evaluation of Terrestrial Habitat Evaluation Procedures and Their
336
Mitigation and the Multiobjective Planning Process
343
Design for Mitigation
355
Unmet Mitigation in the Lower Mississippi River and Tributaries
419
Energy Resource Development and Wildlife Preservation
424
GrayrocksA New Approach to Mitigation
434
Wildlife Habitat Evaluation and Mitigation Analysis of a Proposed
441
A Review of Factors Involved in BirdTower Kills
469
An Approach to Mitigating for
481
Public Land Management Opportunities for Mitigation
488
Estimating Stream Macrobenthos Benefits from Low Flow Augmentation
491
67
495
Use of Dredged Material Disposal in Mitigation
502
A Preliminary Evaluation
508
71
510
Computer Simulation A Means of Developing an Aquatic Mitigation Plan
516
78
518
An Analysis of the Proposed Rules to Implement the Coordination
527
Elements of a Policy on Mitigation of Environmental Damages in Michigan
536
Promising Legal and Procedural Strategies for Reserving
546
Habitat Enhancement for Colorado Squawfish in the Yampa River
553
A Viable Option in
562
Arkansas
572
Habitat Mitigation in Indianas Authorized Channelization Projects
582
Wildlife Damage Mitigation for Californias State Water Project
590
POSTER SESSION
596
Mitigation of Lost Fish Production in the Senegal River
602
Wetland Preservation in the Atchafalaya Basin
608
The Use of the U S Fish and Wildlife Services Habitat Evaluation
621
A Structural Vegetation Classification for Inventory
627
An Industry Information Resource to Catalog Power Plant Cooling
633
Mitigation of Impacts Affecting WhiteTailed Deer at the Seven
639
A Machine for Mitigation of Salmonid Spawning Habitat from Silting
645
The Fishery Conservation and Management Act as a Tool
653
The Effect of Crested Wheatgrass Plantings on Wildlife
665
Committee Members
684

Overige edities - Alles bekijken

Veelvoorkomende woorden en zinsdelen

Populaire passages

Pagina 25 - While work on a required program environmental impact statement is in progress and the action is not covered by an existing program statement, agencies shall not undertake in the interim any major Federal action covered by the program which may significantly affect the quality of the human environment...
Pagina 28 - Impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. (d) Reducing or eliminating the Impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. (e) Compensating for the Impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. § 1508.21 NEPA process. "NEPA process" means all measures necessary for compliance with the requirements of Section 2 and Title I of NEPA.
Pagina 437 - Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.
Pagina 533 - Ultimately, of course, it is not better documents but better decisions that count. NEPA's purpose is not to generate paperwork — even excellent paperwork — but to foster excellent action. The NEPA process is intended to help public officials make decisions that are based on understanding of environmental consequences, and take actions that protect, restore, and enhance the environment.
Pagina 536 - ... is likely to pollute, impair or destroy the air, water or other natural resources or the public trust therein, the defendant may rebut the prima facie showing by the submission of evidence to the contrary.
Pagina 270 - Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States...
Pagina 28 - Mitigation" Includes: (a) Avoiding the Impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. (b) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and Its Implementation. (c) Rectifying the Impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. (d) Reducing or eliminating the Impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action.
Pagina 535 - Mitigation (§ 1505. 2(o)) and other conditions established in the environmental Impact statement or during its review and committed as part of the decision shall be Implemented by the lead agency or other appropriate consenting agency.
Pagina 28 - State whether all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the alternative selected have been adopted, and if not, why they were not.
Pagina 526 - Act provides in part that : [W]henever the waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized to be impounded, diverted, the channel deepened, or the stream or other body of water otherwise controlled or modified for any purpose whatever, including navigation and drainage, by any department or agency of the United States, or by any public or private agency under Federal permit...

Bibliografische gegevens