Pagina-afbeeldingen
PDF
ePub

REMARKS on the GENIUS of
MISS BAILLIE.

Now, assuredly, it is a matter of high interest to observe in what manner, and with what powers, a writer

To the Editor of the Universal Mag. would endeavour to simplify the

Sir,

EW circumstances, connected

more curiosity than the attempt of an individual to compose a series of plays illustrative of the effects of the whole range of the stronger passions; especially when it is understood that the adventurer meant boldly to view both sides of the impassioned countenance, and was sedulous to depic. ture the ridiculous as well as the tragic results of those conflicts to which the human bosom is subject.

drama in a period Jike the present.— when the purest specimens of artificial elegance, and the grandèst proto teach him what to avoid, but are so fascinating and so beautiful; meanwhile, that they are more likely to tempt him to follow them as guides than to avoid them as quicksands.

The comedy of Miss Baillie is of that simple, unmixed species, which may be denominated characteristic. The characters are not strongly marked, nor opposed to each other in bold lines of contrast, but gently intermingle, and exhibit their peculiarities in soft degrees of difference. It is thus, no doubt, that characters appear on the real stage of the world; but we cannot readily believe that a tame and literal reflection of the features of society is the style of representation calculated for the admoni tory school of Thespis. The historical painter uses marked contrast, and a strength of delineation almost emblematical of character, rather than strictly imitative; and surely the dramatist would be correct in following his example? But Miss Baillie appears deficient in the great fundamen tal qualification of a comic dramatist -humour. Divide comedy into as many classes as we please; particularise and describe these classes as the characteristic, the satirical, the witty, the sentimental, and the circumstantial; still, it is the business of the comic muse to "show the very age and body of the time its form and pressure," and the talent required for the successful achievement of this salutary purpose has ever been, and ever must be, humour.

The present is an interesting period for so adventurous and novel an endeavour. When the poets of Greece first woo'd the coy and many-tempered muse of the drama, the people were refined, and Homer had incul. cated chaste and critical opinions concerning the structure and attributes of poesy. On the other hand, Shakspeare laid the foundation of the English stage during an era which (as far as regards poetry) was rude as winter, and dark as midnight. The consequences were precisely those which might be expected. The productions of the Grecian muse were lofty, polished, and sentimental: all that art could perform was effected; but nature and the muse maintained an injurious and immeasurable distance. The grand, though trackless, flights of Shakspeare's genius were directed by an aim entirely opposite. The human passions formed the basis of his plays, and tints warm from Nature's own pallet were employed to bestow effect on the rude but captivating and faithful picture. Still, from a want of acquaintance with the works of those who had Jaboured to deduce precepts of art from the results of experience, he frequently so mingles the passions in To turn agreeably some proper the course of one representation, that it seems probable the greatest But how rarely is this quality the possible effect is not regularly elicited possession of a female bosom! The from materials so productive, al- ranks of literature boast of females though the wonderful and unprece- conspicuous for wit, eloquence, pedented power of his self-dependent netration, and strength of judgment; genius must be admitted by all. but not of one who could display the

66

Humour is all; wit should be only brought

thought."

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

least resemblance of the humour personages are possessed of strong and evinced by Shakspeare and Cervantes, original leading features. Miss BailSterne and Fielding. From habits lie's versification is not of that smooth of education, indeed, it would appear and uniform description which Adthat females have little opportunity dison first introduced to dramatic of cultivating this propensity. The writing. Her transitions are quick, desirable delicacy with which their and her manner judiciously adapted minds are usually nurtured, denies to the variety of her characters. In them that full, broad view of the short, her tragedies consist entirely coarser parts of life, from the con- of natural sentences, harmoniously templation of which it is probable arranged.

cur humorous authors derived that If Miss Baillie had never read glowing maturity of faculty which Shakspeare, her genius would appear has enabled them to convulse a world prodigions. But it is evident that she with laughter, and to render vice has studied him with profound and midespicable merely by exhibiting it as nute attention.. Still, she is far remote irresistibly ridiculous. Be the cause from all servility of imitation. She what it may, we cannot admit that has endeavoured to imbibe his cast Miss Baillie possesses humour. Her of thought, not tamely laboured to comedies are pretty, tasteful, and di- copy his manner, as was the case verting. The characters are usually with Rowe. And this, it must be drawn with undeviating accuracy, But there is a general want of strength. Still, occasional flashes intervene, so replete with observation and so finely elucidative of character, that criticism forgets its office, and we forgive the rest of the scene for the beauty of a single passage.

observed, is precisely the mode in which Sir Joshua Reynolds recommends every student in the sister art of painting to form his genius. Such imitation is, indeed, not more profitable than it is rational and noble It would be poor and mean to give a mere parody of those abrupt exclamations and profound remarks which distinguish Shakspeare's characters from all others: but it is liberal and ingenious to analyse the vein of mind and mode of perception which enabled Shakspeare to represent nature and human circumstances in colours so just and attractive.

But who shall hastily appreciate the merit of Miss Baillie in tragedy Here she stands alone among the moderns, and agitates the passions with true poetical magic. Her plays are written in strict attention to that rule of Aristotle which declares terror and compassion to be the legitimate objects of tragedy. The passions of Such is the degree of imitation to love and hatred are among those on be noticed in Miss Baillie; and when which she has already exercised her we observe that her judgment of pen; and from these opposite ma- mankind keeps pace with the fidelity terials she has succeeded in achieving of her imitation, and that her warmth a similar result. In regard to the of fancy at least equals her strength unities of time and place she is nei- of judgment, how surprising must it ther strictly chaste (according to the appear that all her pieces, except one, practice of the ancients) nor wan- are strangers to the stage! We have tonly licentious, as was so frequently now a solemn and massy pile erected the case with the greatest dramatic as a national theatre, which a specgenius that the world ever produced. tator would be led to suppose was And this temperate medium appears constructed for the exclusive reprewell calculated for the great purposes of the drama, since it permits a display of the growth and progress of passion, without affording scope for such a wild, excursive detail of incidents as destroys the simplicity and harmony of the fable. Her characters are genuine, distinctly marked, and well preserved. Even the subordinate

sentation of elevated tragic composi tions. Yet, in this building, sing-song farces and "inexplicable dumb shew" chiefly prevail; while plays, like those which have led to the present remarks, are to be found only in the closets of the few who have sufficient industry and good-taste to seek for dramatic merit in the tomes of neglected plays,

rather than in the thin volumes of Et de vos fictions le mélange coupable Même à ses vérités donne l'air de la fable. Et quel objet enfin à presenter aux yeux, Que le diable toujours hurlant contre les cieux,

such as are familiar with the public stage.

I am, Sir,

Your constant reader,

Qui de votre heros veut rabaisser la gloire J. N. B. Et souvent avec dieu balance la victoire.

On the INJUSTICE which has been done to the MUSE of TASSO.

SIR,

[ocr errors]

OPULAR opinion has been frequently, and not unaptly, compared to a telegraph, which repeats without comprehending, and transmits a decision without knowing the meaning or penetrating the secret.This is strictly true with regard to Tasso, whose works, in consequence of one of Despreaux's satirical shafts, have become the slander of little tongues: Tasso, however, would not have been treated with such severity and injustice, if our immortal Addison had not become the echo of Boileau's malicious comparison, made in all appearance for the sake of the rhyme. The lines stand thus:

Tous les jours à la cour un sot de qualité
Peut juger à travers avec impunité,
A Malherbe, à Racan préférer Theophile
Et le clinquant du Tasse à tout l'or de
Virgile.
SAT. 9..

He, however, gives a note, wherein he says, that a nobleman gave this decision in his presence.

One reason, amongst others, for the satirist pronouncing so harshly against Tasso was, that he disliked the nature and the machinery of his Poem of Jerusalem delivered, which he thus expresses in the third canto of his Art of Poetry:

C'est done bien vainement que nos auteurs déçus,

Bannissant de leurs vers ces ornamens reçus, Penseut faire agir dieu, ses saints et ses prophetes,

Comme ces dieux eclos du cerveau des

poetes;

Mettent a chaque pas les lecteur en enfer:

Now the safest way of ascertaining the value of an author's opinion is to compare him with himself: if we pursue this plan in the present instance, we shall find that, upon the whole, Boileau, however he might quarrel with the structure of his poems, highly applauds him in other respects, and ranks him even with Virgil himself, whom, as a model, he had most happily followed. This is the testimony of that same Boileau, in his Critical Dissertation on the Joconde of La Fontaine. He observes,

3

La Fontaine à pris à la verité 'son sujet de l'Arioste; mais en meme temps il s'est rendu maitre de sa mateire ce ne'st point une copie qu'il ait tiré un trait apres l'autre sur l'original; c'est un original qu'it a formé sur l'idee que l'Arioste lui a fournie. C'est ainsi que Virgile a imité Homere; Terence Menandre, ct! TASSE VIRGILE.

No argument is wanting to shew the high rank of Tasso as a poet after such a confession from Boileau; and if Mr. Addison had either attentively read Tasso, or the whole works of Boileau, he would not so inconsiderately have condemned the first epic poet in the Italian language, nor have left imprinted on the mind of his readers a censure equally illiberal, uncandid, and unjust.

I may probably hereafter enter more fully into the real merits of Tasso, who is but imperfectly known through the medium of Hoole's Translation, and by a comparison of passages shew, that he merits to be classed in the first rank of epic poets.

I remain, &c.

Z.

EMILIUS AND SOPHIA; OR THE RECLUSE

N'offrent rien qu Astaroth, Belzibuth, Lu- To the Editor of the Universal Mng

cifer.

De la foi d'un 'chretien les mysteres terribles

SIR,

D'ornemens égayés ne sont point suscepti-F you are of opinion that the ac

bles:

L'evangile à l'esprit n'offre de tous côtés Que penitence à faire et tourmens merités;

companying work will be worthy a place in your Magazine, you are at liberty so to use it. I translated it, in

[ocr errors]

moments of leisure, from the works of Rousseau, a writer whose name I pronounce with reverence. It is but a fragment: yet, such a fragment as bears all the impress of its author's genius. I have the less scruple in offering it to you, because, as far as I know, it has not been translated into English for though a sequel to his Emile, it was not published till after his death. Under such circumstances it may, perhaps, be read with interest by those who have perused his former work a work for which Rousseau taid of himself (with culpable vanity) that he deserved a statue of gold to be erected to his memory in every kingdom of Europe.

:

[blocks in formation]

It must be confessed that the only benefits upon which man can calculate, are those which his soul treasures up and hence, the only effectual means perhaps of providing for his felicity, is to give him sure an

which he had relinquished to carry on the composition of his Confessions.

We now present to the public the only part of it which he had written, and we candidly confess that we bring it forward with a degree of repugnance. In proportion as the picture which he delineates has all the marks of its sublime author's genius, in that proportion is it offensive. Emilius mad, Sophia degraded! Who can endure such a picture? But let us not impute this to Rousseau: we know it; it was no part of his plan or intention. Would he, himself, have debased his noblest work? Sophia was guilty, she was not despicable; imprudent connections were the cause of her faults and her misfortunes.

Why, it may be asked, did not Rousseau finish this melancholy narrative? Why did he not conduct Emilius and Sophia to that final happiness which every reader must wish them? Had he lived, had he finished this work, he doubtless would have done so; and it will ever be regretted that this most interesting off-pring of his genius must remain unfinished, for where is he that can take up the pen to conclude what Rousseau began?. EMILIUS AND SOPHIA; OR THE RECLUSE.

Letter the First.

tidotes against the ills of fate, either I was free! I was happy! Oh my in enabling him to repair those ills preceptor, you fashioned iny heart to by the force of talent, or to support taste of happiness, and to crown it them by the power of virtue. This you gave me Sophia. A rising offwas the great object of Rousseau in his spring added the charms of paternal Treatise on Education; and the fol- solicitude to the bliss of love, and to lowing work is intended to prove that the warm and glowing effusions of he had accomplished his object. By friendship. All indicated a happy placing Emilius in difficulty, by sub- existence; all promised a soft decline jecting him to a series of calamitous of life, and a peaceful death in the events, which the most intrepid indi- arms of my children. Alas! where vidual could not encounter without are now those blissful hours of fruishrinking, he has endeavoured to tion and of hope: hours, when the shew that the principles in which he future added charms to the present; was brought up from his youth were hours, when my heart, drunk with those which, alone, could render him joy, each day ingulphed ages of felisuperior to those difficulties. The city. All, all is vanished as a dream. idea was a fine one, and the execu- All is lost; wife, children, friends: tion would have been no less interest- all even to the intercourse with my ing than useful, for it would have fellow creatures. My heart, alas! brought the moral of Emilius into has been torn from all its dearest ataction, have justified it, and rendered tachments; one only now remains, it amiable but death prevented Rous- and that one trivial; a lukewarm love seau from raising this new monument of life; a life whose only happiness is to his glory, and to resume this work that it is free from remorse.

Should

I long survive my losses, Heavens! structions from my pleasures. All what will be my fate? an isolated men recal with affection the sports of being, grown old in sorrow, and their infancy. I am, perhaps, the doomed (secluded from the sight of only one who mix not with those soft any human being) to terminate my remembrances the tears of nature existence with Providence alone to which they cause. Oh! that I had close my eyes. died while an infant! I should then have known life without its pains.

In my situation then, what can induce me to regard with complacency a life I have so little reason to esteem. -What but remembrance, and the consolation of being in the order of the world, and of submitting with cheerfulness to the all-wise decrees of God. To all that was dear to me I am dead; impatiently and fearless I await that awful moment when I shall be summoned to immortality, and shall rejoin that which I have lost.

When I had attained the years of manhood, my happiness suffered no interruption. At the age when influenced by my passions I formed my opinions from reason, that by which others were deceived pointed out to me the road to truth. I learnt to judge judiciously of the things which surrounded me, and of the interest which I ought to espouse; I passed my decisions from principles at once simple and true; neither authority nor opinion could corrupt them. To discover the mutual affinity of things, I first studied the analogy which each separately bore to myself: thus then, from two known terms, I was soon enabled to discover the third. To become acquainted with the universe, as relative and interesting to myself, my first great aim was to become acquainted with my place; that assigned, all was then found.

But you, my dear preceptor, do you yet live? Are you yet mortal? Are you yet upon this earth an exile with your Emilius: or do you already habit those blest abodes, that place of immortality with my Sophia? Alas! wherever you may be, to your Emilius you are dead. Never more will these eyes behold thee: but in my heart thy image is indelibly impressed. Never did I better. know the value of thy instructions and care, tiil I also learnt that the greatest wiscruel fate inflicted on me her blows, dom consists in being content with and deprived me of all but myself, whatever is, and to regulate our heart and that despair itself has not been according to our destiny. Often have able to annihilate. Hardly dare I you told me, that that is all which hope these papers will ever meet thy depends on us, every thing else being eve. Doubiless they will perish ere necessity. He who obstinately strugthe sight of man is cast upon them, gles against his fate is always least But I care not: they are written: I wise and most miserable; and the have collected, have joined them: I unnecessary trouble which he gives will still continue, and to you do I himself to alter his situation, exceeds address them. To you will I relate the anxiety he before experienced. these sad remembrances, which elate He rarely succeeds, and when he and wound my heart. To you will I does he gains nothing. What sensible disclose myself, my sentiments, my being can always exist without passion, conduct; and that heart which you or without attachment? He cannot have moulded in my bosom. I will be a man; he must either be a brute confess all, both the good and the or a God. Inadequate then to the bad; my misfortunes, my pleasures, and my faults; and I do not hesitate to athrm I shall confess nothing which can dishonour your work.

While yet young I tasted of hap piness; it commenced even with my birth: ought it not then to cease before my death? The days of my youth were days of joy; passed in liberty, in bliss, and in innocence; never did I learn to distinguish my in

task of protecting me from all the various affections by which we are attached to things, you at least learnt me to choose, to suffer my soul to receive only the most noble, and to attach myself to the most deserving objects of my fellow creatures; 10 extend, as it were, • le moi humain" to all humanity, and thus to preserve myself from the detested passions which concentrate in us.

« VorigeDoorgaan »