 | United States. Department of the Treasury - 1918 - 676 pagina’s
...the additional duty Imposed by that act. It Is a general rule that where computation is to be made from an act done the day on which the act is done Is to be included. — Arnold v. US, 9 Cranch, 104. Merchandise on Vessel, Not in Warehouse — Act... | |
 | United States - 1918 - 1192 pagina’s
...date. Matthews v. Zane, (1822) 7 Wheat. 211, 5 US (L. ed.) 425. Where the computation is to be made from an act done, the day on which the act is done is to be included. Arnold v. US, (1815) 9 Cranch 120, 3 US (L. ed.) 671. The rule of construction in... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Yards and Docks - 1924 - 748 pagina’s
...of a day. The American courts have, in innumerable cases, applied the general principle, that where time is to be computed from an act done, the day on...apparent that a different computation was intended. Though divisions of a day may be allowed sometimes, to make priorities or give other advantages in... | |
 | 1878 - 542 pagina’s
...Ryman v. Clark, 4 Blf. 392, and Long v. McClure, 5 Blf. 319, the ancient common-law rule that when time is to be computed from an act done, the day on which the act was done should be included, was recognized and enforced. In Hathaway v. Hathaway, 2 Ind. 513, however,... | |
 | 1882 - 542 pagina’s
...United States, 9Cranch. 118, it was declared to be the general rule that where computation is to be made from an act done, the day on which the act is done should be included. Hence, an act of Congress, imposing additional duties to be levied and collected... | |
 | New Brunswick. Supreme Court, Ward Chipman, Sir John Campbell Allen, Allen Otty Earle, Thomas Carleton Allen, George F. S. Berton, David Shank Kerr, George B. Seely, James Hannay, William Pugsley, Arthur I. Trueman, Esq George W. Allen, George Wheelock Burbidge, William Henry Harrison, John L. Carleton (barrister-at-law), Ernest Doiron, Douglas King Hazen - 1905 - 608 pagina’s
...This case was recognised in Jarvis v. Peck, 8 Kerr 507, as having established the practice, that where time is to be computed from an act done, the day on which the act is done, is to be included in the computation. In a previous case of Hatch v. Scoullar, 1 Kerr 571, which was... | |
 | New Brunswick. Supreme Court, Ward Chipman, John Campbell Allen, Allen Otty Earle, Thomas Carleton Allen, George F. S. Berton, David Shank Kerr, George B. Seely, James Hannay, William Pugsley, George Wheelock Burbidge, Arthur I. Trueman, John L. Carleton, George W. Allen, William Henry Harrison, Ernest Doiron, Douglas King Hazen - 1894 - 760 pagina’s
...least '' in the Acts of Parliament, and do not over-rule Clowes v. Scoullar, which decided that where time is to be computed from an act done, the day on which the act iB done is to be included in the computation, and which we must consider to have settled the nractioe... | |
 | United States. Court of Customs Appeals - 1923 - 748 pagina’s
...to take effect from its passage; and it is a general rule, that where the computation is to be made from an act done, the day on which the act is done is to be included. In the foregoing case, however, there was only one point of time which was involved... | |
 | 1910 - 1496 pagina’s
...the levying of the execution and the issuing of the commission, the authorities establish that where time is to be computed from an act done, the day on which the act is done is to be included in the computation, Rex v. Adderley (Doug. 463), Castle v. Burditt (3 TR 625), [258]... | |
 | 1900 - 1272 pagina’s
...until the day after Its passage, It was held that, as a general rule, "where the computation is to be from an act done, the day on which the act Is done le to be included." In Perry v. Insurance Co., 99 Mass. 162, an Insurance policy provided for defendant's... | |
| |
Cases may be found in which it is held, that, where the computation is to be made from an act done, the day on which the act is done is to be included. 
