If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of Congress, though limited to specified objects, is plenary as to those objects, the power over commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, is vested in Congress as absolutely as it... John Marshall: Complete Constitutional Decisions - Pagina 433door John Marshall - 1903 - 799 pagina’sVolledige weergave - Over dit boek
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1979 - 790 pagina’s
...society that conclusion should not be disquieting. The exercise of such power is restrained only by the "wisdom and the discretion of Congress, their...the influence which their constituents possess at clwtions. * * » They are the restraints on which the people must often rely si'lely. in all representative... | |
| Iowa State Bar Association - 1905 - 822 pagina’s
...persons, and the transmission of messages by telegraph. They also show that the power to regulate commerce among the several states is vested in congress as...power as are found in the constitution of the United States; that such power is plenary, complete in itself, and may be exercised by congress to its utmost... | |
| 1915 - 1150 pagina’s
...of a public policy which is dictated by their several peculiar needs. "The power over commerce with foreign nations and among the several states is vested...constitution the same restrictions on the exercise of power as are found in the Constitution of the United States." Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 6 L. Ed.... | |
| Ellen Frankel Paul, Howard Dickman - 1989 - 316 pagina’s
...Congress, though limited to specified objects, is plenary as to those objects, the power over commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, is...power as are found in the constitution of the United States. 44 It follows therefore that "plenary" powers were understood by Chief Justice Marshall to... | |
| Richard F. Hamm - 1995 - 356 pagina’s
...action. He asserted that the commerce power extended to incidents of trade, such as navigation, and was "vested in Congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government." Furthermore, he argued that the power could not be stopped "at the external boundary line of each state."... | |
| |